Rare video: Bangladeshi freedom fighters are taking oath in 1971 | Page 12
@extra terrestrial
there is nothing subjective about who was what in 1971. the Bengali Muslims who fought against their own nation (East Pakistan) were traitors - they fought FOR India and USSR.
this is not a freedom...
Bangladeshis would have known best if such things happened. you wouldn't need to force them to hate what was their own country they built.
and even if such things were true, it does not justify India's invasion of East Pakistan and installing a puppet system and a puppet governance.
what is...
many have "joined" Bangladesh just because they had their entire families or extended families there. many Bengalis also remained in ex-West Pakistan.
United Pakistan's achilles heel was East Pakistan geographically and also socio-economically. Hindus dominated Muslims in Bengal throughout the...
PLO and Hamas would be the same if they were fighting in favour of Zionists.
Soon you will know better
like how many of these "freedom fighters" found out they were fighting against none other than themselves as Indo-Soviet agents
the Indians deny settlement of non-subcontinental and non-Bengali Muslims in Bengal because their distorted sentiments are supposed to trump generally known things among Bangladeshi people and even scholarly journals. the "Indic" area from East Bengal (Bangladesh) to West Punjab (Pakistan) has...
immature statement amid current affairs engulfed in wars related to imperialist interests over resources and racial supremacy. compared with JeI, BAL is a group of wild animals with strong bigoted ideology and the roots of its destructive tendencies go back to the Hindu zamindari era and the use...
every Bangladeshi district has jokes and stereotypes about the other district. and this exists across Hindu Bengal, Muslim Bengal, northern Hindustan and central Hindustan, and Punjab and Sindh. what is not always present is a big hostile regime in between two areas.
i'm giving my two cents...
"What you guys are doing is poisoning your future with it"
i expected better from you.
if knowing one's own history means nothing to you, why try to stop others for whom it means something? whether one is Hindu or Buddhist or Christian or Muslim, or belong to one community or region or nation...
JeI is the best organized and most principled major political party. i honestly see being called JeI is a compliment. calling the word "jamati" is a whole different thing. this practice with intending any derogatory connotations has no place in a Muslim society or a tolerant society. a jamati is...
the issue is not personal at the source as you are making it to be. it's different from just listening to Tagore (which i find distasteful by the way but that is a whole other matter). that Tagore and Sanskrit-heavy things have been imposed on Muslims is reality. the causes could be many. and...
cool. but this about having something representative as a national symbol, like national anthem. a Korean song cannot be Japan's national anthem and vice versa. those Hindu zamindars ruled over Bengali Muslims and systematically oppressed Muslims. they developed one version of the Bengali...
even if that is true, that is not the issue in this case
money is one thing. another thing is ideology. Hasina is more anti-Muslim than her father. although, hardcore commies used Sheikh Mujib to make East Pakistan an Indian vassal, they did not get along as well as those commies and Hasina...
Hindus are lower class? what are you on? Hindus in Bangladesh have historically been the rulers. Hindus in Mughal period worked in Mughal administrations but after colonization they worked for British and became zamindars dominating Muslims. they have since been ruling this land we call...