Search results

do everyone a favour by disassociating yourself from the culture or heritage of Bengal, because your association with Muslimphobic Hindu Nationalism goes against it. Sorry this was too much fact in one post for you to digest. I know your digestive system is cramped with juvenile myths that you...

.. and so were Nur ul Amin, Khwaja Nazimuddin and Iskandar Mirza who were the Chief Minister, Prime Minister and E. Bengal Governor respectively who dealt with the so-called "Language Movement" and were all Bengalis. and apparently shooting at masum students was not exactly what happened

interesting. i did not know this.

be honest with yourself. is this line true? or was it Bengali Muslims who "deceived" the northwestern Muslims to join with them united in the name of religion (and common heritage) is BD really peaceful? or you want a pissing contest? does BD being East Pakistan suddenly transform itself into...

Bengali “Language Movement” for Dummies Myth vs Reality (not exhaustive) Myth 1: The “Language Movement” wanted the eradication of Urdu Reality: the political activists participating in the “Language Movement” wanted Bengali to be side-by-side with Urdu as national languages of United...

"missing the wood from the forest"?? since Akhbar's time (1600s), Bengal was directly a part of the Mughal empire. and the ultimate rulers were direct descendants of Babar. because you didn't know, Babar's family was not the only Mughal people that existed. he had entire groups of people...

not all Mughal subehdars and nawabs were direct descendants of Babar. since Bengal became part of Mughal empire, the posts were appointed was as per the dictates of the Delhi-based administration and/or the provincial administration. my advice to you is try revisionism a little less and try to...

unfortunately that is true. even if it is our common heritage and identity that binds Bangladesh people to Pakistan, many people, including some (BDi) Pakistan supporters, feel the need to downplay that factor, like we see how iajdani and bongbang both tried to only highlight the cricketing...

"liberators" in big sarcastic quotes the Nawabs of Bengal-Bihar-Orissa since 1600s to when British colonized were considered Mughal. there were ones who were independent and those who were joint with the North India-based administration. Mughal Nawabs and subahdars did not all fall directly...

what should SM had done? gas chambers? or mass firing squads? or starvation?

there are other places if you want chit chat and lame humour even within this forum if not outside

Pakistan is BD's sovereign form. anyways you cannot take the 'Pakistan' out of Bangladesh or take out the 'Pakistan' out of Bengal. Pakistan movement runs deep here with or without the Peshawariyon

they are not just being ignorant. they are distorting history to kill people or justify the killing of people. they are distorting history so that anyone who opposes this psuedo-Hindu nationalist system right now in BD is a 'bad person'. so how long can we keep on letting them do that? our...

the Nizamis and Sayeedis were razakars** who helped the population. whereas the AL commie terrorists destabilized the entire country and helped Indian army to step on the soil of this land. this is besides the atrocities they carried out on anyone they found to be opposed to this Indian...

if you are a Muslim, can you do otherwise?? there were 70 million East Pakistanis in 1971. and a handful of militant Muslimphobic people, who were not even on the same page as Sheikh Mujib, turned those 70 million people into a basket case. yes, i want justice. are you Muslim? then why are you...

East Pakistan was already a separate country. why didn't you invade West Pakistan and changed its name instead and left East Pakistan alone? fascism runs in the blood of too many Indians you know those ghaddars deserve the fasee who turned Muslim Bengal into a Muslimphobic psuedo-Hindu...

thousands of Bengali intellectuals, doctors, engineers and professors lived and worked in erstwhile West Pakistan. after the crisis of 1971, they claimed citizenship of Bangladesh. shouldn't they have been the first to be "butchered"? the brain was cut off from our body long time ago. otherwise...

BAL's only "point" is it has Indian backing. otherwise it could not stay in power a single day - it could not kill a single opposition person

what is so controversial about Zaid Hamid?

you are right. i'm impressed with your observation of Bangladesh, and the prevalent perceptions (and misinformation) that exist among people. Nawab Siraj ud Daula was SUPPOSED to be our hero but he is not. not only this one person, but every single personality, event, or political movement...