Search results

Someone, especially one who inculcates law & rules to other people, should understand that set of rules made for one matter cannot be applied to another. How can you apply rules for adjournment motions to privilege motions when rules for adjournment motions themselves say they can't be applied...

I thought you wanted people to learn law and rules, especially ones which deals with sub judice matters! From procedure book to news item! But anyway, what are we talking about, law and rules or speaker's discretion? Towards two motions, please read the title of the thread, we are talking...

Chapter 12 in your own link, it covers privilege. Whereas rules and conditions you referred to fall within chapter 13 which covers adjournment motions. Chapter 13, rule 111, condition "k", read as --- It shall not relate to matter of privilege. It means adjournment motions and privilege motions...

How about reading the proviso to rule you highlighted, 111(o) ? Anyway, these conditions are applicable to adjournment motions, not to the motions based on the question of privilege, please read condition "k" and title of the chapter. The motion brought to the house is not sub judice at all...

You don't say it lawmaker, your PM lies through his teeth in this very so-called supreme institution.

The only point I made was about distinction between politics and national interest, please disregard my post if you don't deem IK as a politico. Like I said before I don't doubt IK's patriotism, it's just that he's politically immature and unfortunately has a bunch of advisers who are good for...

Since it's about NS so return to parliament is justified, if someone thinks that he/she should give it another thought. Terms national interest and politics are not interchangeable, this should be knocked into the heads of IK and his advisers. I don't doubt PTI patriotism but they seriously need...

Developments in past 2-3 days Inconclusive evidence against Yadav, Sartaj Aziz. Pervaiz Rasheed is back from hiatus. Early notification of CJ. NAP was made under pressure, has no value. Ker lo jo kerna ay sada!

True that case won't be treated as part heard, things have been left for coming CJ to decide. Dafuq! Material submitted by parties is on record however, no one will be able to disown anything submitted already.

True! Also he was able to secure a job for his son Adnan Jamali.

Grab your pills I prescribed you last day.

Pawista reh shajar se umeed e bahar rakh. You can surrender your nationality but you can't surrender your identity.

I would rather withdraw my case. If 5 member bench can't do jack tau single member commission ke pass kon se geedar singi ho ge? You need iron balls to rule against mighty Sharifs.

Hearing has been postponed till 1st week of Jan 2017, no decision made on commission. New bench will be constituted and case will start from zero. Reason being Kindergarten will remain closed for 15 days, kids will have winter vacations. YAY

@PakSword @Farah Sohail @war&peace @Doordie @El_Swordsmen @epicname @The Eagle Guys you have another white elephant to feed!

Absolutely correct! Things have now moved beyond that, Sharifs have failed to prove money trail. Good that you edited your post, anyway. :)

One can't simply challenge anything without evidence which outrightly annul what is being challenged, mossack fonseca is challenged on the basis of a document which is inconclusive in itself. So what happened to burden to prove being on Sharif? If SC can't get this ascertained then it should...

Arrange antihypertensive pills for coming days, you might need those pills. :)

Caesar's wife must be above suspicion. Having benefit of doubt does not mean a clean chit. NS is PM of this country, both morally and legally he has to prove his innocence, if he can't he should leave even if he gets benefit of doubt. There's nothing as insufficient proofs in case of Sharifs...

Judges have to bear the pressure, they shouldn't have taken up the case in first place if tackling pressure was beyond them, judges want a scapegoat to face repercussions of the verdict. If JC was the only option then why did SC waste time on proceedings in the name of arguments, it should have...