Search results

Unless an opportunity for rebuttal is provided to petitioners SC can't accept these documents (CMA).

I am not sure whether it's an asset or not; by asset I meant salary. Public representative has to declare everything, everything means everything, including sources of income.

SC already has these documents, same is true for JIT and PTI. Question is about the declaration, not about provision or non-provision of the documents. Neither FBR nor ECP has any declaration on oath which shows NS's assets in UAE.

No, after 2013 general elections.

He was supposed to declare his chairmanship and salary in Form 21 of ECP which every member of the assembly files with ECP every year. He has never declared this in any of the official declarations.

Nawaz Sharif is a pathological liar, I am sorry I can't help my fingers.

This safa is is now being relied.

Tax and wealth returns, filed every year.

He didn't declare his chairmanship of Capital FZE and his salary he would get as a chairman. He didn't declare his overseas accounts, Al Rajhi in particular. He didn't declare amount he received from PMLN and the list goes on.

You're mixing up two aspects of the case. Money laundering and all fall within the category of criminal offenses and SC does not entertain criminal trials neither can declare anything on disputed matter, that said SC will simply refer this stuff to trial court, NAB court to be precise. SC will...

Undoubtedly it's a complete topi drama, he'll be normal by tomorrow evening. Tomorrow he'll brag his loyalty towards NS for like an hour or two and by the end of his press conference he'll resume his job on same tankhawa. On a serious note, actually he has some genuine concerns and reservations...

Any new twist in Nisar's drama? Nisar reminds me of a joke I heard a few years ago. Nisar Kaisa paida howa? Jawani jaan e man haseen dilruba milay jo dil jawan Nisar ho gya. :lol: TBH I don't know but judges' observation "PM to face consequences if children fail to furnish money trail"...

You missed the trick! When you raise an argument that Maryam is figurehead of NS or NS's benamdar then you can't raise the argument that Maryam is dependent of her father because doing so would negate previous argument. She being NS's benamdar is more obvious than being dependent of her father.

No reason to discard either, Sharifs didn't challenge the fact. In law you actually accept what you don't deny.In white color crime investigations such documents are not neglected while connecting the dots. Moreover all the transactions are well reflected in NS's account, there's no reason to...

Baji's supporters now -- It's Hussain Nawaz who submitted those trust deeds, why would she be indicted? Pseudo-journalists now -- SC can't disqualify NS because order dated 20.04.2017 requires his summoning before any declaration. :enjoy:

Okay, jokes and wishes apart, minority judges can't amend their judgment however they'll be free to revise their judgement if a review petition is filed later on. @Farah Sohail has a long list of wishes, lol, if she were a judge she would amend her judgement accordingly no matter what law...

Possible! This was an option to continue part-heard case as part-heard case when a new bench was constituted after justice Jamali. I am not sure if it's possible in this particular case. Suit/Petitions/Application keep visiting different judges while being pending, new judge doesn't restart the...

Apke khawahishon ke list lambi nahi hoti ja rahi? I'm not sure if a judge in this particular case can observe written replies and arguments. What if two judges give their notes on the basis of written replies and arguments?

Representation of People Act, 1976.

Section 100 of ROPA.