Search results

Accepted and accepted for formal hearing are two different things my dear friend, Pakistan is yet to present its legal position. Excuse that consular access thingy wouldn't give Pakistan a reason to raise Kashmir related issues in ICJ isn't justified both legally and morally. First off consular...

What strategy? ICJ has no jurisdiction in this matter, period. Citation - Atlantique case.

JIT will have predetermined TORs, so it's not that easy for Sharifs.

Teeter ya batair? Katta ya Katti?

Tentative judgement shouldn't take that long. Batti is uncatchable, better to halt the pursue.

I'm pretty much here on this very forum. :) Had a tough schedule though.

@PakSword @Farah Sohail How far is truck's batti that you guys have been following for months now?

May Allah grant her shafa and give her the best of health, amen! Bro I can help in Karachi only.

It's an admission that leaked docs are real, negation of previous stance that docs were forged. Another twist in cock and bull story. Aesop seems to has been left far far behind, say hello to Sharifs, best storytellers of all times. Trust deeds being ineffective justifying the stance have been...

Yes he's from Mansehra, may be an Awaan from de facto PM's in laws.

Justice Azmat is an intelligent judge, his observations are tricky & he grills both sides. Justice Ejaz Afzal ain't literally acting as defense counsel, he's actually a defense counsel, only difference is that he's wearing an embroidered robe.

True, SC history is not that encouraging, especially in the context of Sharif family, Sharifs have been always treated as children of a greater god. Nothing can be ruled out, however time has changed and it won't be easy for courts to favor Sharifs this time round. Justice Afzal is more...

He made some additional points today but IMO are not applicable until consul for two bubblos completes his argument. We are yet to see SC response to two infamous letters, Salman Raja is actually relying on Qatari prince, one who's representing Hussain Nawaz. I really don't see it happening...

My bad it's section 164, not section 162, latter has no evidentiary value whatsoever. Ishaq Dar reordered his confessional statement u/s 164 of CrPC. He accepted the role of approver & after pardon he recorded his statement. Sec 164 CrPC deals with recording of confessions and statements...

Please sir reread last two lines of the post you'll understand I am saying the same with an extra option.

You can read it online, don't necessarily have to download.

https://newsbytepakistan.com/ Here, let me know if you can read. Or from this tweet @Farah Sohail please find link to Rehman Malik report.

That's why I said a small commission tasked with verification of certain docs can't be ruled out. What we miss is the fact that none of relevant documents can be verified from UK or Germany. Ownership of Nescol and Neilsen can only be verified by BVI authorities and unfortunately law there...

Have you read the report? All the annexures are evidence (checks, bank statements, land registries etc etc)

Exactly, justice sahib is actually saying Dar was/is an approver. Bro, statement under 162 CRPC is not something one can disown.