Search results

I thought you knew Mil Courts in Pakistan were constituted under Constitution of Pakistan.

What made India to repeal its previous declaration? One declared before 1974? That's the absolute prerogative of a nation. Not binding on ICJ, hell! Do you know ICJ's proceedings are not binding?

These are special courts, Yadav's attorney for sure had all the information. Above all confession before a judicial authority is the last nail in the coffin according to Common laws, you should know better because India too follow common laws.

And what does Pakistan's declaration has to do with this case? Are you saying Pakistan through crystal ball foresaw Indian application coming in May?

ICJ can't, I repeat it can't. Have you read the Indian application and Pakistan's declaration for recognizing ICJ jurisdiction? The sole argument is denial of consular access under Vienna convention, the application is about consular access and not about the trial, please understand the...

As if ICJ is an authority to decide competency of the court? Whether India accepts or not, the court awarded Yadav death sentence is a competent court.

ICJ can't sit on judgement adjudicated by a competent court constituted under the constitution of Pakistan, Yadav was sentenced to death under domestic laws and ICJ is no entity to look into the matters decided under domestic laws. Suspension of the sentence is totally out of question, for...

Jab is record se kuch nikle tau please tag me. Question tau false statements ka bhi tha, us ka kya bana? Now the center point is money laundering, na money laundering ke investigation ho aur na he disqualification. Aik civil nature case ko criminal case bana diya majority judges ne. Sorry my...

Agar woh record use ho sakta tau SC ke larger bench ke hath kiss ne rokay howay thay. Justice Khosa is a minority judge unke notes ke koi legal value nahi. Justice Ejaz Afzal ke notes perho aur order dekho, saaf zahir hota hay ke partisan.

Agar use ho sakti hotien tau FIA ke report jo ke on the record the use ho jati, judges ne NAB reference ko open kerne ka order bhi nahi diya. Agar JIT ka mandate sirf Sharifs se documents produce kerwana hota tau dynamics bilkul different hotay. Investigation nahi ho saktien, simple as that.

True that, ill gotten money used for terrorism can be investigated regardless of legal cover, BVI authorities will have to comply. But the question is the relevance of Sharifs' laundering to terrorism, more importantly such engagements are made between governments and I doubt government headed...

How can JIT verify the ownership of two BVI entities? BVI laws don't allow unless there's a special agreement and why on earth government headed by the accused will let this information to make it to court? In a single sentence -- Jo mawaad SC Sharifs see nahi nikalwa pai woh JIT kahan nikalwa...

Sons of a greater god are beyond any laws. Kya rai dein, kuch nahi ho sakta is mulq ka aur awaam ka. I am sorry but the reality is it's all over.

Lady, that's because the case has been literally disposed off in favor of mighty Sharifs.

Unlike referred case, all controversial cases are open for review in SC Pakistan. Many have been taken back or amended. What? Whether it's democracy or any other form of the government, the judgement is passed on merits and not on analysis. Get your facts straight bud!

Sir apki badshahi mein aur kahan ho sakte hein! Thori masrofiyat ziada ho gai thein pichlay dinno. Khair ap batao, how have you been? Kaise rehnumai bud?

Courts that hang people on the basis of collective conscious of the society? People Vs Guru, SC of India.

What is in common between treaties/agreements and application grounded on denial of consular access? What is in common between UNSC resolutions and jurisdiction of ICJ? Please don't amalgamate functions of different organs of UN. Simla is a bilateral agreement, India has always asserted this, so...

If you're listening to experts like one who gave his expert views on Pakistan's SLCM test then better you should do a little research at your own. Let me give you a few reasons why there's no legal room for India. 1. ICJ can't invoke its jurisdiction when matter (criminal/war related) is...

As it was for India when Pakistan approached ICJ for Atlantique, eh?