Search results

It says " it may pass appropriate order" it doesn't say " it shall pass an appropriate order" If it passes an order for filing a reference means it's done with its order and a new case alias reference lies before ECP through speaker, in other words ECP decides disqualification.

Who'll interpret the judgement? That's why I said it was prerogative of CJ. BTW such high profile cases aren't decided by DBs, larger or full bench is required. Given the notes of majority judges I doubt Sharifs will ever show trust in bench comprising of majority judges. Trust me it'll be...

First try to understand the basic fact relating to the judgement, minority judges' ruling is not enforceable, the legal status of NS as of now is that he's still a legal PM of Pakistan. But you're right there's confusion in the judgement, it doesn't specify whether the CPs are disposed off or...

@Farah Sohail, let me make it plain, how can Justice Khosa and Justice Gulzar hear the case when they have already given their judgment on merits?

That's the prerogative of CJ, he'll decide which bench shall hear post-JIT case. If the same bench, the bench tasked to monitor JIT proceedings, continues to hear post-JIT case then to disqualify NS the judgement has to at least 2:1. Majority judges are there in monitoring bench because they...

The fate of the bench that passed the verdict is not clear in the judgement. However, the judges who declared NS disqualified can't remain in under law unless it's a review petition.

True, the court order was unanimous, only the order. Number of judges required to disqualify NS will depend on the number of bench members, the bench tasked to hear post-JIT proceedings. Agar larger bench mein 5 member howay tau at least 3-2 ka ratio aur agar full bench howa tau more than half...

Allah behter kare ga In Sha Allah!

Their verdict has been bulldozed by majority judges, that would mean operational parts of their judgement are no more valid. They won't be the member of any bench constituted for further proceedings, what I have learnt from a reputed lawyer of SHC.

Shajr hoga tau pawista raha ja sakta hy. Filhaal tau bahar see ziada shajr ke achi sahat ke ummed rakhni chahyay. Umeed e bahar na chhoro per hath per hath dharay muntazir e farda bhi na raho. Waise, you have got a good memory!

Awesome, I wonder who poetized, Aftab Iqbal?

Mohtarma aise he aankh jhapakte 2018 ke aam intikhabat aan pohanchain gy aur aala hazrat Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif Panama walay aik martaba phir iqtadaar ke kursi per barajama ho jaien gy, mein aur app tab bhi panama scam kay faisalay kay muntazir hon gy. Yeh faisla nahi aker day ga bibi, yahan...

Regrettable that India is relying upon technicalities and blatant lies and not upon merit. The argument that 2008 agreement being unregistered has no binding is an immature rather a bizarre technical argument which also contradicts long standing position of India on bilateral...

WS Saeen, kush ahiyo tawahan? Legal systems have got nothing to do with what you're trying to say. As an agent Dr. Faisal made it crystal clear in his opening statement as to why Pakistan opted to appear which you seem to have missed. In case if you don't know ICJ compulsory jurisdiction is...

Do you know transcripts of such tapes are also annexed? Do you know confessional statement signed by Commander Yadav in front of a magistrate is part of Pakistan's reply? Do you know India has submitted a news article of Dawn news as evidence? Do you know India has submitted transcripts of press...

I would laugh and lament simultaneously, laugh because it couldn't be more infantile and lament because hundreds of poor fishermen of both sides will suffer. Lamentible for other reasons too, for instance India had to rely upon technicality rather than merit.

Sorry but the court isn't going to decide fairness or unfairness of the trial, all it's going to decide is consular access. Couldn't agree more with rest of your post! But we shouldn't overlook the fact that Yadav is a con, he is handed death sentence for espionage and killing innocent...

One shouldn't tell lies, that too before a court. A terrorist's life doesn't even deserve my time let alone the time of the court.

True that, Dr. Faisal in his statement said "Pakistan can show confessional statement (excerpts of approximately 6 mins duration) but unlike India Pakistan don't want to waste precious time of the court" Indian media is a crap of some highest degree, it deems ICJ request with no legal binding...

This is what you think dude. And yes, every accused gets a defense lawyer.