Search results

Salman Akram Raja lost all the respect and honor he earned in Asghar Khan case! What a waste! "Your track record is bad whenever you're given time you forge documents" A judge reacted to Salman's excuse. Feeling bad for a lawyer who once was a wonderful and energetic lawyer!

Judges right now -- :butcher: Khawaja Haris right now -- :hang3: Salman Akram right now -- :fie:

This article answers many questions regarding FZE Capital . @PakSword @Farah Sohail and others A Dubai law firm has submitted a legal opinion to Pakistan's Supreme Court on Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's alleged employment in Dubai, verifying that the employment documents which imply he was...

There is always an alternative analysis which he sprinkles between the events. He has sources especially in establishment, there's no denying.

A million dollar question. Hope the court comes up with a valid and logical answer.

Yes, not everyone in Pakistan uses brain for reasoning. Agar aisa hota tau corrupts kabhi elect nahi hotay Pakistan.

He builds two narratives, jo bhi sahi niklay aur mosoof keh sakien dekha mein ne kaha tha na.

Hahah! What's wrong with him? He's implying a deal has been struck.

Obviously everything is subject to the constitution, I thought it was well understand between people. I never said SC had a boundary beyond constitution. My post had a context which you seem to have missed. Anyway if I take your argument valid then the judgement passed by two minority judges is...

True that, there's no boundary for SC, it is also an authority to interpret law.

I am afraid two cases are entirely different. One you just quoted was brought to SC under it's appellant jurisdiction while one being heard, Panama scam case, was brought to SC under 184(3) which falls within the original jurisdiction of SC in matters related to public importance. "How far...

Lol! No, I don't watch him, a friend of mine shared his thoughts an hour ago.

Heard that Dr. Dhabardhoos today was implying something fishy. What's the story? @PakSword @Farah Sohail

That's typical Sindhi. What is your question exactly? You as a member can't start a private conversation, you can write on users' profiles however.

Judges literally quashed all those objections, Haris was admonished repeatedly to focus on the contents. Defense counsel nay specifically koi argument build nahi kiya JIT members per. It'll ultimately end up in a trial court, even defense wants it to be referred to NAB court. Defense ke sath...

For those who understand Punjabi -- murgi janno gai per khaan walay noo sawaad nai aya. Sheikh Raheed is in the court because PTI lawyers are in the court otherwise Sheikh Rasheed and JI lawyer wouldn't have lasted few minutes of court's proceedings. What Sheikh sahib argues is rhetoric not law...

We are not closing the doors on you, you can still file objections on the contents of report through a CMA: Justice Azmat Saeed. Judges seem to be in mood to give more time to Sharifs.

JIT exceeded it's mandate, they inquired 15 questions instead of 13. SC has limited jurisdiction under 184(3), arguendo even if JIT report is true SC can't pass any order directly. NS lawyer is back to square one. o_O

Trial court mein case refer hoga tau trial court mein vol 10 helpful hoga na. According to Kashif Abbasi, JIT is waiting for U.K Authorities' reply to MLA request on attachment of avenfield apartment in Al Towfeeq case that's why they want this Vol to remain confidential for sometime. JIT itself...

I am not sure, 10 day time period is all I remember.