You dumb folks pick something and revolve around it since your rebuttal is so weak.
Brothers in faith doesn't necessarily mean you will have great relations with them.
Your jahiliat barks out loud ... Pakistans nearly alll major milestons and figures come from the west end not east...
its very easy for Kabul to dispel this conspiracy
dump the durrand line narrative and propose what they want to do with it.
We know Tajiks are not our friends but we have to decide on the better evil at this point.
Brothers just like Afghan or Arabs.. dont change the goal post and come to the point which are the reasons that Bangladesh should have been a spearate country from day 1.
.
well your language shows you didnt even go to school.. or got proper tarbiat.
the 71 war started after India...
i think he is only talking about international border only..he knows LoC will remain hot in near future whenever ceasefire break, but it would keep Pakistan focus on many other things in the meanwhile.
who told you that
india can become whatever it wants
Pakistans religion was NOT the only...
Those last 100 posts dont reflect the last 5000 posts.TBH i don't think pakistans salvation lies in party system.Pakistan should have presidency system and elections based on non party basis..where individuals are voted into power.i would prefer technocrats to rule the country over tribal or...
No dude.. ..it seems to you because most of the times I reply to you and folks like you who blindly cheerleade and don't dissect the goods and bads. ... I would choose pti over pdm anyday.but at the same time I would openly talk where Ik played politics and lacked.
You can see my history how...
Bangladeshi are like my brothers.. . Infact most agree that Bangladesh should have been a separate country soon after Independence..that way the two countries would have great relations unlike what you got after 71 and even today.
your own version of history ..
History very well states...
Hah ..simpleton . ISI IB FIA NAB rangers police work in a synergy..
And federal and provincial governments can always request Information on something and have it validated. They can have someone picked up if they deem it necessary regardless what isi or Army chief thinks about it
Not really there were baloch sindhi and pashtun in British army.
Majority coming from densely. populated regions doesn't prove much in your rant.
Equating them to today's army is clutching straws at best.
1946 elections in punjab and sindh.. majority voted for Muslim league that had agenda...
Why do isi chief wear civilian suit?
Isi is always at disposal to the federal govt. And provincial governments. And PM/CM decide what he wants a particular isi manpower to do .
And we all know agencies workoutside the system of law.. similarly faiz was also picking up anti pti and anti...
Illogical conclusion.. they could have stayed as a british colony if we go by your superficial views...
It doesn't matter had there been a pakistan or not without them..this is not the discussion.
The people who funded pakistan movement many were local to pakistan and india of today ...
East pakistan was never ours to begin with.. learn proper history instead of emotional rhetoric. A land surrounded by enemy from three sides and situated thousands of kilometers away should have been a separate country from day one.