Search results

I don't think you will succeed in making any Chinese here feel ashamed that our leader is being a courteous host and fulfilling basic diplomatic conventions and duties :P At one point, I thought @Feng Leng's observation, that Hindus display dominance by flinging poo like monkeys, was too...

India should cut out the German middleman and buy directly from China to make big savings. For India, we all know that every penny counts - every penny poured into the coffers of foreign military-industrial complexes (and there have been many such pennies over the decades) is a penny denied in...

If India had such a decisive, even lethal, strategic advantage, how come they capitulated so readily and made a unilateral withdrawal and retreat? Hindus have never been the most rational, but are you telling me they deliberately chose humiliation, disgrace and loss of credibility when they had...

Presumably you mean me, @Raphael. I wonder, how many times have you bothered this poor mod? How many times have you summoned him to read about India's humiliating unilateral withdrawal and retreat from Doklam? :disagree:

Many Chinese are catching on to the fact that India's foreign policy is not rational but religiously motivated, much like ISIS'.

Any non-Hindu country would feel humiliated after being intimidated into unilateral withdrawal and retreat. But apparently for Hindus, capitulation is the 'biggest win'. That can only suggest that the Hindu track record on geo-strategy, like many other Hindu track records, is embarrassingly scant.

I often marvel at Indian logic. Building roads and infrastructure will cut countries off from each other? Roads can only increase connectivity. Even Sino-Indian trade will benefit from more roads.

Vietnam's decision comes in the wake of India's stand-down at Doklam. India's unilateral withdrawal and retreat seriously damaged its credibility. The Vietnamese have been left to doubt whether India is a reliable partner and whether, if they get into trouble with China, they can rely on India...

We never claimed we could outmatch you in talking, chattering, boasting. The difference is how we implement plans and actions once the talking is done.

Court petition claims Taj Mahal is in fact Hindu temple for Shiva, demands Hindu right to co-worship This claim is disputed by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/30/taj-mahal-muslim-tomb-not-hindu-temple-indian-court-told A court in India has...

Maybe more aggressive, maybe not. China's policies always demonstrate extreme strategic discipline and single-minded focus on long-term gains. We are never interested in scoring cheap temporary points. That sets us apart from India because their political elites are always looking to make...

Hindus begged us to stop construction, but we rejected their pleadings out of hand. We said 'no' and thereafter the matter became dismissed. Instead we will complete construction. The Chinese Foreign Ministry has been very clear on that - there's simply no room for you to misinterpret such a...

What another ridiculous example of Hindu interpretation :lol: 'Will complete construction' is written in the future tense, not present. It says nothing about the present, so nothing about present circumstances, including construction, can be inferred from it. But without doubt, it can only mean...

Mr. Ho is actually a Taiwanese-American. How come you editorialized the thread title and omitted his citizenship? I guess in your mind, if they're not white, they're not American. Your racially exclusionary mindset it what provokes many American citizens to lose control of themselves and...

@Götterdämmerung Fact check please.

Actually, the Chinese FM clearly stated that China 'will complete construction plans for the Dong Lang (Doklam) area'. You're lucky you squirmed into the US before the reign of Trump. Otherwise, his English language requirement would have precluded your entry :cry:

India will become Innovation Superpower :tup:

Where did I deny it? Both are statements from the FM. But for a very suspect reason, you prefer the more vague, less informative quotation over the direct quotation that confirms China's resolve to complete construction. It's not a preference many non-Hindus, or honest people, would have. It's...

The greater clarity of the quotation in my article is far more informative for us. So because it decisively rebuts your version of reality, you think you can run away from it in desperation, and cherry-pick less clear, more vague earlier statements? And then dishonestly trying to pass it off as...