Search results

:lol: ...had that been the case, west would have bought all of us, way back...when even you were dirt cheap, no?? I wonder what kind of noob i have to be, to think pride and nationalism is trade mark of few civilizations....:disagree:

The very first example of living free is that I can choose how many baby's I want to have...so how about if we start from there?? Look...every system has it's benefits and flaws...denying flaws or over blowing flaws of other system wont change anything...you may feel you are free citizen in...

why would it have had happened...after all...it was not a stone pelting saga...which some idiots can spin off and show it as a success :lol:...

why would it...it is not coming from mouth of high IQ Chinese people....otherwise there is enough fodder for you to ponder...question is ...do u want to?

Not that i favor sending troops however this is my last reason for not doing so....It is the same mistake that west did...After USSR fall out they left leaving Pakistan an open license to use these proxies in Kashmir...it just didn't bother west much...and then what happened?? West learned it's...

What?? May be spoon feeding is something you guys are found off, however anyone one with an iota of reasoning knows what chinese counterpart meant.... Because even a brain dead person know that a skirmish can't be used as a counter argument for your lossed in war...b/w it falls well within...

I think either you are not aware of it, or else meant that but didn't word it properly...Did you mean that Pashtun is the largest ethnic group in AF?? They are about 42% of the population....so not a majority but largest ethnic group..and this martial race etc are things of past...I am...

what...not you don't believe your own govt.? Man...high IQ can have so many side effects...i could never fathom :disagree:

Do we have the capability to maintain and operate a base in AF?? I mean think about it...neither we have deep pockets, nor we have the capability to produce weapons on large scale and neither an affordable route...also what purpose will a military base in AF will achieve?

since you know "them" so well, can you please help us, how long they will show their patience?? couple of more months, years.?? As even a dog would understand that as the time pass...Indian defenses are going to only become more harder to penetrate...

Do you even read before posting?? I think I will miss the fun of trolling without giving any botheration to brain cells...

?? are you referring to CAG report based on 2014 status or something else??

That BS is in your head....world over the attrition is pretty poor when it comes to rape(though conviction is better than other crimes)...also when it comes to rapes...here are some stats... http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Rape-rate#2010 So don't let your hatred for India...

Making racist comments on state run media certainly looks awesome and thus should have pulled some strings somewhere...i agree :agree:

Again you are calling it junk...may i know on what basis?? Is it junk because it has not got FOC?? If that is the case then you need to call JF-17 a junk as well...why? - because had JF-17 Indian then even that place would not have got FOC from IAF....and had Tejas been Chinese/Pakistani plane...

any other media reporting it...sounds like fake...i mean stone pelting by soldiers...really??

I think you are mistaken on many counts and not listening to what i have been saying...for example, on one hand you say it is disputed territory b/w Bhutan and China and on the same very count you say it is chinese territory....first clear your stand on this... Now let's talk about border - god...

Then plz stop calling it a chinese territory....nor it is an Chinese administered area....that is the whole freaking problem with the area there....anyways the issue is not about whose control it is, or not....Even the bhutanese royal guard tried to dissuade them during the initial phase...

I will certainly share this however would you be impartial and listen?? Anyways let me share my thoughts... 1. It is classified aggression as per who?? China?? Otherwise this is a disputed territory and a very well defined mechanism on how to address it. China has unilaterally tried to change...

both bold parts are exactly my point...that's why they used to say - "defense of east lies in west"...pay attention to the above line....having said that....if the land and people were so worthless there was no need to send anyone...it was not as if 90k plus people were some expendables...which...