Guys, i see some of members here believe that a defense minister needs/ideally to/should have defense background...however please also keep in mind...the most important quality we need in defense minister is to get the job done...no? SME in a particular subject can be an additional asset however...
Freaking hilarious....people just cant digest the fact that China lost her face in this particular issue...b/w comon..this is not the end of the world...why such idiotic attitude shown here by chinese and cheerleaders??
man..seriously, are we too bankrupt(mentally) that we are showing such comprehension issues even in such plain statements?? India concern was simple - no road construction....Chinese are not constructing road there....if in future they will, we will see how India will respond, however as of now...
if you want to read it like that..then yes, that's exactly what it mean...otherwise before road building were they not exercising their so called sovereign rights? so what difference is b.w exercising sovereign rights before and after doklam issue? The so called restrictions were always in...
well we can only speculate...back door channel negotiations are not and will not be in public...from what it looks like, unless Chinese go back to road building...then perhaps we backed down...otherwise that would be china's position...
There wont be...and there cant be...think about it...lets assume that it is India who ran away from standoff...do you think India and China can openly say that?? Now replace India with China in previous statement....the logic of not making it apparent will remain the same...no??
As said in...
Yes, so what it means? this is the face saving formula, for both sides.....go back to status quo...without making it very obvious....and that's the reason no one is talking about freaking road...
I understand your point...thanks for explaining....the amount of sheer idiocity i have seen here, makes me literally puke ...Now here are couple of observation on official statements from Indian source quoting MEA...
a) Indian side that " Expeditious disengagement of border personnel is...
Are you seriously this blind??? We stayed their for more than 2 months, listened to the most bizarre threats that would put even a 5 year old to shame...and now we are running away?? :lol:
How can you analyse if you are biased?? Is it even possible??
Then your sources needs to wake up from their dream...key board warriors can spin anything :disagree:....it was a given...the road construction has to stop...as simple as that....now diplomats from both side needs to be complemented that they figured out a face saving formula for both sides...
Family planning is encouraged, not forced..as in democracy you can't....this is the difference i am trying to portray here...also when western countries criticize China...then they do it as per their version of freedom/system...i am sure China also does the same...no?
keep living in 62 then....this spanking coming, that spanking coming...i mean sometimes i wonder how can worlds most populated nation act so immaturely...India media is not state controlled, so i can understand their jingoism...however i will never expect such ridiculous barrage from let's say...
May be this is precisely what they(read china) want?? Arrogance is the last thing we need to show, and that too a country who has been friendly....should Bhutan decide that India has no business there, then in all earnest we need to pack our bags...it is after all their land...Yes, we will be...