Search results

salute, RED FLAG 2010, going to have some drink..:P

stealthy version is on paper yet...:)

i was wondering the same,from where they get such info or they make up stuff...

official link please for k-100 you are talking about..

welcome KID to defence.pk nice start with ur 1st post....LOL!!! now go to 1st page before posting another post...:welcome:

http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/524215_503453259681588_1894342891_n.jpg

LOL! you say im not MKI fan boy yet ur theory shows only foolishness that jf 17 with out an AWACS is blind against MKI....LOL! read it again and have a nice laugh at ur self and ur theory...and then i hope you will come to know that u are really a KID...

LOL !!! should i really reply to a KID that comes with his new theory that says something like this... "a jet whose radar is having 130 km range against a fighter sized object...IS BLIND WITHOUT AN AWACS" LOL!!! wow.... you know last time you asked me to MIND MY LANGUAGE.. but...

hi, we so called fan boys of jf 17 never said that JF 17 is better or more potent than sukhoi 30 MKI, rather we just make all INDIAN FAN BOYS realize that SUKHOI MKI is no GOD's creation and its never an invincible aircraft, our statements are only for those who think MKI is invincible...

TRANSITION TRANSITION... first off,dont teach me these baby things.. now check what you said in ur previous post.. and now it is maximum....LOL!!! WHAT???? really??? get a set of two eyes....LOL!

SELF DELETED

so would you like to tell me who told you 200 km tracking range is for 10M2 target??? ITS MAXIMUM....MIND IT...!!!!!!!!! and here you can check what vayu sena is saying..now do ur calculations and i will see how you do say that MKI can detect and track earlier.. The Su-30MKI Info Page - Vayu...

are you moron? this old article i have read million times, while kanwa interview came recently...

LOLzzzz... check the kanwa report that was saying after tweaking, the detection range has jumped upto 130 km against a 5m2 target...lolzzz

GOOD..but you seem to be forgetting that BARS has 140-160 km "detection" range against a F-16 block 15 which has 5m2 RCS, check the vayu sena tripod website that says a MIG 21 for instance can be " detected" at 135 km... so now calculate 85%( according to you tracking range is 85% of detection...

we ran because after failing to recapture those peaks india eventually went to USA begging to intervene,and then nawaz went to USA, USA asked him to retreat from those peaks...and hence we retreated...LOL!

and what about that official list dont bring now that video of urs since it has got nothing to do with casualities on pakistani side, now before you jump and say pakistanis can make fake list.. i would like to tell you that dont let me debunk what ur army told to world about laungwela,about...

now what about this??? BBC News | SOUTH ASIA | Coffin scandal rages in India LOL!!! seems like there were too much indians dead,hence coffin scandal needed to be raged..LOL! DO ALL OF YOU FAN BOYS KNOW?.. when ur government decided to celeberate victory of kargil ur...

hey kid stay away.. the video is just bursting ur bubble off, that PAKISTAN ACCEPTED BODIES AFTER DECADE, while the video itself is DECADE old...LOL! well,ur still going with ur link ? ok wait,here what the link also saying According to the document, “July 4th, 1999 was probably the...

LOL! who CALLED own soldiers terrorists? it was NAWAZ who after going USA returned with having ORDERS of retreating what INDIA begged USA for....LOL! so one can easily assume..who can speak lie on media...obviously it can only be nawaz..not the army chief, as for pakistan admitting their men...