Search results

I like this reply of yours. Just put Indian government in place of Tipu and Kashmiris in place of rebellions. India is just following what you are proud of. Only difference is it is Muslims at the receiving end not non-muslims.

For buying gold you need to provide your PAN card. This is highly improbable route to take.

Your answer confirms my point

Isn't the frustration getting build by now? <Insert expletive of your choice> itna time ho gaya cheer kartey kartey match start hi nahin hua.

If that so why China and India went on war in 1962? Basis of this war comes from forward policy on India then. If India had not opted for this policy but made arrangements with proper logistics then outcome would have been different from 1962 current outcome. It might have been a stalemate. The...

If India had used the same approach which Pakistan used in Pakistani Kashmir , Indian Kashmir would have more peaceful and progressive as well.

There is no denying that Pakistan army has that capability. But even if it was taken by drone then camera should be moving but here it is standstill. Secondly, look at the visual and sound there has to be difference in both of them but in these videos it is coming together.

:-):-):-):-):-)

First visual looks genuine but the second one looks totally fake. In the second footage Look at the camera angle from top they are showing the blast along with sound. Sound and blast visual without any delay is enough spot that it's fake.

I never said assuming, but implicitly yes. So it is for Pakistan to say and people like you to say "Kashmir is not part of India therefore there is no need for Indus water treaty". It will only absolve and abrogate the treaty but also give India the leeway on abrogating it.

Very well Gentlemen. With these answers of yours it is well understood who is running away from reality and has been a moron.

Here is another part of the treaty which clearly mentions India not Kashmir With this treaty Pakistan government has implicitly said that Kashmir is part of India. Otherwise the treaty would have been only for the eastern rivers ot for the western. Would you get into a agreement if someone...

Assuming, it is you who is assuming that Kashmir is not part of India and India to not abrogate the treaty? Your logic gentlemen , marvellous.

I have mentioned implicitly, Can you please answer why this treaty is between Government of Pakistan and Government of India?

Indus water treaty : - This is the preamble of Indus water treaty , it is between Government of India and Government of Pakistan. This treaty confirms two things:- 1. India to use 20% of water and 2. India's legitimacy over Kashmir from where the upper three western river flows. (Though...

India kare na kare tu amb lene aa

With force nothing will happen until or unless you are Uncle Sam hell bent on bringing Democracy. Only way forward is mutual trust, India has not even utilized what is there in IWT for herself since 1960 nor it has gone back during 65,71 , Kargil and others. This should have been much to assure...

Whether you consider it Trickery or not but it is there in letter and word in UN Resolution. India cannot turn its back on which it has signed.