Search results

Except that their terrorism isn't geared towards liberation from the yoke of the State of India. They want India all right, but in their own political way. Success of an idea is what is relevant. Not individual accomplishment. Anyway, I wonder why Pakistanis find a stick up their posterior...

A successful 'terrorism' is freedom-fight. All Indian freedom fighters were terrorists to the British. All Mukti Bahinis were terrorists to the Pakistanis. All Kashmiris and Balochistanis are terrorists to their respective countrymen. So on and so forth.

There, fixed it for you.

Aha. The Jalal syndrome. But can you elaborate so I can learn and possibly rectify my mistake in assessment. Final battle? What final battle? And the mutinies were not against British colonialism.

Except that your founding fathers were pretty comfortable with the idea of the Brits hanging around.

Does this hold true for all minorities or just the minorities of Pakistan? Just curious.

It is amazing, how after close to 70 years of existence, Pakistanis are still looking for a rationale behind that existence. Sad. And amusing.

He has already moved on to his next brain-fart.

So? The same report also says "(a)s the army had resorted to force to impose their will, the leaders of the majority party were entitled to call for armed resistance to defeat this action by an illegal regime." None of those is relevant in proving PA's act of genocide. You were denying...

After the initial holocaust of the army crack-down in Dacca, the Pakistani authorities appear to have been pursuing in particular members of three identifiable groups, namely members of the Awami League, students and Hindus. Anyone who was identified as belonging to one of these groups was...

Couldn't agree more. I was merely corroborating the fact that Manekshaw did in fact say something like that. Quite some time ago, I had clarified it to a Bangladeshi, who got confused by this very quote . Below is the post: Notice also, that Manekshaw never said '60,000'. Shh...don't...

No it didn't. Pak army's butchery of Awami Leaguers and then minorities did. After March 26, 1971. And BSF was involved throughout. And Mukti Bahini was officially formed on April 17, 1971 with the formation of Bangladesh Govt. in exile. During the initial period of this insanity, India...

Manekshaw did call them cowards. "Every time I sent them in, every time they saw a burly Punjabi or Pathan, they ran, leaving their weapons behind" Manekshaw retreads thin red line between field marshal, dismissal

Manekshaw also never said that sky is blue and earth is round. How does 21st February, 1952 sound

First the verdict: http://www.pca-cpa.org/showfile.asp?fil_id=2471 Now, some relevant parts as pointed out by @Roybot Neelum-Jhelum Hydro Project was initiated before Kishenganga Hydro Project they said 83. With respect to the first point in time, the Court examined the actions and...

SOURCE From the horse's mouth PS: Where the eff is 'edit' button?

Lately BozoHistorian is being slapped around by Pakistani posters as being too much anti-Pakistan. So he is just compensating, trying his level best - which isn't much, as you can see - to prove that he is a good Pakistani. Let the kid be.

Ever thought of a career in creative writing? You'd make a killing, believe me. My grandfather opted for India because he feared that Pakistan would turn into an Islamic state where minorities won't be able to live with basic human dignity. He was not the only one who thought that way. And...

In all probability Pakistan compensated for that loss. The point is, that Pakistan did receive those fighters, in spite of US sanctions.