Search results

...because those are exactly same as loosing an integral part of a sovereign State.

I think Mr Munshi himself is a RAW agent, just like Zaid Hamid (PBUH). I don't think anybody can act so stupid unless one is paid to do so.

You didn't miss much. According to Nayar: # Lal Bahadur Sashtri started the 1965 war to improve his image (pg 207). # When Indian forces reached Ichhogil canal, Pakistan fought back so fiercely that India had to withdraw '7 mile'. (pg 208) # For Pakistan, the war was a 'Jihad' against...

Here is the latest update on that. IPCC officials admit mistake over melting Himalayan glaciers | Environment | theguardian.com Now try a new angle

You do realize that you are now doubting UN resolutions. First rule of life: If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.

You want India to unilaterally withdraw from her legally held land - legality which is recognized even by UN? What do you think this is all about, a school canteen brawl? PS: You are now resorting to special pleading

1)You have been pointed out before, how the promise of plebiscite was conditional, as is evident from the letter itself. '...as soon as law and order have been restored in Kashmir and her soil cleared of the invader, the question of the State's accession should be settled by a reference to the...

He is 'communally controversial' only in the minds of dumb fvcks such as yourself who, in all probability, haven't read a single line from any of his work.

That quote doesn't appear in his autobiographical essay 'Atma-Parichay'. To be doubly sure, I have tried to search the word 'Bolshevism' & 'fundamentalism' in the translated version on Google Books. There are no hits. The others are quite possibly fake.

You have been living outside Bangladesh for way too long. You just called yourself and your friends, cretins.

Sure. You still haven't explained how Simla Agreement is tantamount to Ms Gandhi accepting Kashmir as dispute.

Oh damn. Here I was thinking I am debating with someone whose age has reached double digits. Meh. Nevermind.

You made a claim. It is your responsibility to provide proof. And Simla Agreement says nothing about Ms Gandhi accepting Kashmir as a dispute.

Did you notice the condition there or just skipped it?

Really? May I ask for her quote?

Actually you have nullified the resolution by attacking us in 1965.

Which PM? When? Where?

Let me highlight the most relevant parts so it is easy for you to make sense of what the resolution is saying: The question of the accession of the State of Jammu and Kashmir to India or Pakistan will be decided through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite [...] when it...

I would rather slit my @ss and swim in shark infested water. After the Calcutta massacre, it was the bestest idea. The bad thing was the manner in which it was done.