Search results

That is not the whole text of the Agreement. And no you will not find the mention of Kargil there. Demarcation was being done on watershed principle, mostly, and on the basis of location points.

You are more dense than I thought. Here it is once again. Tabulated for you. Read S L O W L Y. 1. Whole of Kashmir is ours because the ruler acceded Kashmir to India. 2. But before accession Pakistan had captured certain parts of independent Kashmir. 3. Ceasefire agreement allowed...

Your post #775 is just a statement that lists apparent land disputes. Was there a hidden question that you are expecting to be answered?

Irrelevant. Your claim was that India couldn't capture an inch of Pakistan in '71. I just proved you wrong. Kargil was part of Pakistan as per ceasfire agreement (which is what Karachi Agreement 1949 was). You are way too busy making a fool out of yourself to get his point. Technically whole of...

You remember wrong. Kargil was first Pakistani territory according to Karachi Agreement 1949. It was captured by India in 1965. Twice. First it was returned under UNMOGIP agreement and the second time it was returned under Tashkand agreement in 1966. It was then recaptured in 1971.

Ever heard of Kargil?

^^ And the relevance is....? EDIT: Meant for bilal for post #775

If that is so then you need to explain why Pakistan handed over to China, a piece of land that is, by your own admission, recognized as 'disputed' and hence not Pakistan's property. I will not embarrass you by citing certain law that severely restricts political activities of Kashmiris in P0K...

Firstly, Shaksam Valley was not 'won' from India. It was part of independent Princely State of Jammu & Kashmir and Pakistan won it from them, in a blatant violation of Standstill Agreement with J&K and of course, several international laws. Secondly, Pakistan considers J&K as 'disputed'. Which...

Now would you be good boy and show me where is Calcutta w.r.t Khulna. This is getting beyond ridiculous.

OK. If you are saying it, it must be true.

I must be living in wrong Calcutta (Kolkata) then.

Rarely do we come across people who actually gloat about their country's misdemeanor. Apparently doing illegal stuffs is a matter of pride in Pakistan. In your pointless pursuit to score points you are now saying that your country has no respect for international law. Bravo.

How can someone studying in Calcutta, have 'first hand' experience of what was going on deep within East Pakistan, is beyond me. And why actual 'first hand' experience of Bangladeshis who actually managed to somehow escape Pakistani barbarism, don't count, is even more baffling. Perhaps you can...

I see. Since I've been over this before, please search this forum. She did just the opposite. She visited Pakistan, interviewed Pakistani personnel, sat in a library and wrote her account. Her stories have more holes than a fishing net. Then again, ignorance is bliss. Right. Before I...

I feel nothing. The majority of so called '45%' was captured by Pakistan before Kashmir chose to become part of India. Only a Pakistani can be so proud of his country's naked irredentism.

You do realize, that it doesn't make any fundamental difference if the number is '3 million' or '1 million'. PA's barbarism is pretty well documented and all you have do is look in right places. And no, Sharmila Bose doesn't qualify. There was a Bangaldesh Liberation thread which was locked...

Article 25 creates this confusion because of the use of archiac legal language, which is difficult for a layman to properly interprete. This also helps the mischiefmakers. Anyway. Article 25(2)(b) was actually meant to provide protection to the dalits and also several sects of Hinduism...

Poppycock. Point 2(IV) of India's Nuclear Doctrine, which for some inscrutable reason continues to remain as draft, states unambiguously, India's threshold: The fundamental purpose of Indian nuclear weapons is to deter the use and threat of use of nuclear weapons by any State or entity...

Come on Bang Galore. Our 'tactically brilliant' western neighbours have always, in their 'tactically brilliant' wisdom, known what our response will be in the event of their misadventure. And, invariably, got it wrong. Everytime. In '47 they never thought India would send army in Kashmir (let...