Search results

A 12 year old boy trapped in a 9 year old girl.

If that is the worst you can do to us, man, am I glad to have Pakistan as our adversary.

I have always thought that the monkey trap was just accidental. It appears, there was some method to the madness. May be some parts of the trap wasn't so accidental after all.

Imbecile.

Didn't I do it? Also the proposal that LoC (then CFL) should be turned into IB, was actually Nehru's. Obviously, you view these differently. Right?

If it is clear then it must be quite easy for you to expand on it.

It is within topic isn't it. India has never made any attempt to take back Asai Chin. Or P0K. Although official position of India is that whole of Kashmir belongs to India - legally at least P0K does - India appears to be content with what she has. Clearly India is not 'striving for possession'...

What if I say, wrong. What if I say, that Kashmir is just a symptom of a deadly disease.

You are still not answering that question: what is it that India is fighting for in Kashmir and what is it that Pakistan is fighting for in Kashmir.

You have started jumping from one issue to another. First, the original question, what is it that India and Pakistan are fighting for. What are Indian objectives and what are Pakistani objectives. Are they same. Or are they different. Second, it matters how a country is viewing Kashmir issue...

...and which of the two countries considers Kashmir as the 'core issue'?

...and what exactly do you think India and Pakistan are really fighting over?

See if these help The Future of Kashmir? "Seven" Possible Solutions! | Page 75 The Future of Kashmir? "Seven" Possible Solutions! | Page 79

False parallel. Indians never represented India in British Parliament. Kashmirs represent themselves in Indian Parliament. Can you see where I'm going with this? Yes?

You do realise that the map par Karachi Agreement doesn't have any currency anymore. Shimla Agreement supersedes Karachi and Google draws boundary on the basis of Shimla Agreement. Please tell me you knew that all along but still engaged in this spirited, but futile exercise just because you...

Actually this where you don’t have to apply common sense. It is in black and white. Khor, thence north to the glaciers. This portion of the cease- fire line shall be demarcated in detail on the basis of the factual position as of 27 July 1949, by the local commanders assisted by United Nations...

S/1430/Add.1/Annx.26 is the Karachi Agreement, 1949. My reference to this document was for you to remove any doubt about ‘chapters’ in Karachi Agreement. I had also made reference to UN Treaty Series, Vol. 81 for the same reason. I am glad you have made your arguments on the basis of these...

There are no remaining parts. As with 'I' that you had highlighted - which I forgot to address - is entirely something else. The body text itself is divided in 2 parts. Part I is 'Introduction' and Part II is 'Agreement'. Due to scanning issue, the Part II got cropped in this document. Just...

Silly argument. There are no chapters in that agreement. The total agreement had at least 2 parts. Part I consists of the body text of the agreement and Part II consists of a map pointing out the locations mentioned in the body text. At this moment I can't remember if there were Annexures to...