Search results

Hard to say. It's a split. Many people are condemning it, citing the same arguments as here. Others support it mainly because of "aik to itni garmi, uper se public mein log khaen?" Hard to say how much, though.

Both things are equally condemnable.

Arguable. Both India and Pakistan have some amazing strategists. So can't say for sure.

You don't want us to use Hatf missiles on your tank regiments, then don't send them to Multan and Rawalpindi, sir. If Cold Start is initiated, we will counter by hitting those formations. I have nothing against your nation's ideals, but expect a reaction when you threaten mine. I love Indians...

Except the fallout. The diseases from radiation. And don't even get me started on the effect of such an engagement on the ozone layer. Many factors come into play when we talk about nuclear weapons.

I disagree. I think that justification of using nuclear weapons depend on the target. If civilians are targeted using WMDs, then use of ballistic missiles on civilians is somehow justified as counterbalance. On the other hand, using tactical missiles on military regiments does not justify the...

True enough for this situation. Movies are liberal, don't watch em. Songs are liberal, don't listen to em. Thinking that being friends with opposite gender mean that they're just friends, is liberal, stay among men only. I'm a centrist, but not really; I'm a liberal because I'm not conservative...

I don't think so, as long as you respect her and don't have premarital sex. If you have a girlfriend and you truly love her, I don't see a problem with it. If you have a girl you just have sex with, that's an issue. In short, romantic relationships are allowed, sexual relationships aren't.

You may be right. God help Pakistan from such political mullahs. We oughta vote smarter next time, no?

Darn! My bad.

Feel free to remain indoors all day. By the way, Ramzan teaches us patience, tolerance and self control. Then why is everyone crying about all of this? If you can't even control yourself when somebody eats in front of you, what's the use of the fast that you're keeping? Food for thought (no pun...

I refuse to believe that. There's still hope for Pakistan.

Even the army was helpless i- Say what now? They carried out the unrest because the government allowed it. Simple. The army isn't in the protest halting business anymore.

The constitution of 1973 didn't really base itself well on the Resolution. It had major issues when it comes to fundamental rights, freedom of speech, but most notably the massive role of government in defining religions. It formed a complex situation. Plus Bhutto, being a lawyer himself...

Well, I sure as hell hope that people who are sick or travelling don't spend a day in hunger. Is that what Islam teaches us: unnecessarily starve people who can't keep a fast? I don't think so.

A theocracy demands that the country be ruled by religious leaders. I don't want the religious leaders to define the Resolution. If we're being direct, I want a team of technocrats well versed in law (subject) and having a sense of defining simple sentences into vast detail (since that is...

With all due respect, the public opinion system in Pakistan is in ruins. They can't form a consensus on the meaning, and the system is so broken that it will create a MASSIVE break among the people. And the Objectives Resolution was intended to act as a force to unite, not divide. It should be...

Yes, definitely. Provided that it's defined the way it's supposed to, I don't see a problem with that.

Finally! Someone who gets me!

It depends on what type of parties you attend. The parties I have gone to don't have cocaine commonly. People who are part of the upper class have parties with cocaine commonly. So, from the viewpoint of an average inhabitant of Islamabad, it's why I said what I said.