*Puts on a tin foil hat*
Sure, sure. These liberals and secularists, backed by Rothschilds and Illuminati, wants to destroy Islamic Governments and conquer the Islamic World. We must fight back!
Somebody teach him how to use Google. It's a term in English, so the West must've come up with that...
I also want to ask if you have a law similar to Glass-Steagall Banking Act in US. A boom in banking industry without at least some sort of restriction like the is very troublesome.
That's cute.
Genius guy, doesn't know the difference between Islam and Islamism.
Go ahead and break the Mullah culture, then.
You mean the snowflakes who don't have self control?
Ironic, coming from N League.
That's old news, sir. Why are we repeating the obvious?
Then what are you doing...
Not exactly. If I recall, Wikileaks archives contain a document from the US diplomatic cables informing the Pentagon that they do not know the locations of all of nuclear weapons storage sites and launching platforms in Pakistan. Don't ask me to find it; it is incredibly hard to go through and...
I mean, I'm arguing here. I'm not sugarcoating or anything. Nor am I trolling. I'm considering the argument and taking it along. A respectful one, and if it turns disrespectful, I'll leave.
I was talking about how we couldn't compare tactical missiles and Agni. Because they are used for...
You're overestimating India's intelligence capability here. Pakistan is smart enough to keep their launch sites hidden. The moment India launches, Pakistan launches. We don't wait for the transporting and the loading. That will be done the moment tactical missiles are used, in case India...
*facepalm*
So you even know why tactical ballistic missiles are even used for?
Forget it. You want a dick measuring contest, go somewhere else. I don't engage in troll fights.
Um, we do have second strike capability. Even if you dispute Babur 3, India launching missiles would prompt Pakistan to do the same immediately. It's not something done turn by turn, and thinking that Pakistan will wait for a missile to land at Lahore before firing their own is not accurate...
Then why is your armoured corps ideally positioned to form thrusts towards these areas? In an Indo Pak war, the land campaigns will entail three areas: AK, upper Punjab, and middle Punjab. Even in '65, IA opened the Lahore front to reduce the pressure and concentration coming from Kashmir, which...
What I want to say is that discrimination should not happen. The fact that Muslims are at a majority in Pakistan should not mean that their culture should be respected (I don't see how that's done with this law) at the expense of minorities and their rights. The same goes with India: the fact...
The discrimination is equally condemnable. Thievery sponsored by law, or killing done via vigilantism, I don't care about that. Some Indians will say that at least it's not the law. Some Pakistanis will say that at least it's not killing. You get what I'm saying?
Sad but true. I'll still remain gray, though. Me and many others. If the establishment want an even bigger brain drain, then they can sleep in their tents and tend to their sheep.
Arguable for several reasons. First, both countries benefit greatly from bilateral trade. Second, no diplomatic relations would mean that they're ready to tear apart many families that function because of the diplomatic relations. Third, that would kill any potential cricket prospects, which is...
Yeah it's insane. The moment Burqa is legally imposed, I'm either out on the streets protesting my arse off, or I'm out of the country first chance I get. Mullah culture sucks.
It goes both ways. All this has started making people slowly aware of the dangers of extremism. As our government goes more Islamist, our people think more moderate at the same slow rate. Rule of the thumb in Islamic countries: a more conservative government leads to a more liberal people, and...