What's new

Search results

  1. Vazir

    Nisar hits out at 'secular' political opponents

    *Puts on a tin foil hat* Sure, sure. These liberals and secularists, backed by Rothschilds and Illuminati, wants to destroy Islamic Governments and conquer the Islamic World. We must fight back! Somebody teach him how to use Google. It's a term in English, so the West must've come up with that...
  2. Vazir

    Indo-Pak ties: Who will end up on the losing side?

    I'm not the official judge, but I think Spain won. ..........
  3. Vazir

    Indo-Pak ties: Who will end up on the losing side?

    I also want to ask if you have a law similar to Glass-Steagall Banking Act in US. A boom in banking industry without at least some sort of restriction like the is very troublesome.
  4. Vazir

    Indo-Pak ties: Who will end up on the losing side?

    But how well is your laws on public declarations of assets and revenue of banks? That is the real question.
  5. Vazir

    Nisar hits out at 'secular' political opponents

    That's cute. Genius guy, doesn't know the difference between Islam and Islamism. Go ahead and break the Mullah culture, then. You mean the snowflakes who don't have self control? Ironic, coming from N League. That's old news, sir. Why are we repeating the obvious? Then what are you doing...
  6. Vazir

    Indo-Pak ties: Who will end up on the losing side?

    Interesting. A question, though. How are your commercial bank laws? Restrictions? Separation in commercial and investment activity, if any?
  7. Vazir

    Indo-Pak ties: Who will end up on the losing side?

    Not exactly. If I recall, Wikileaks archives contain a document from the US diplomatic cables informing the Pentagon that they do not know the locations of all of nuclear weapons storage sites and launching platforms in Pakistan. Don't ask me to find it; it is incredibly hard to go through and...
  8. Vazir

    Indo-Pak ties: Who will end up on the losing side?

    That is an assumption, sir.
  9. Vazir

    Indo-Pak ties: Who will end up on the losing side?

    I mean, I'm arguing here. I'm not sugarcoating or anything. Nor am I trolling. I'm considering the argument and taking it along. A respectful one, and if it turns disrespectful, I'll leave. I was talking about how we couldn't compare tactical missiles and Agni. Because they are used for...
  10. Vazir

    Indo-Pak ties: Who will end up on the losing side?

    You're overestimating India's intelligence capability here. Pakistan is smart enough to keep their launch sites hidden. The moment India launches, Pakistan launches. We don't wait for the transporting and the loading. That will be done the moment tactical missiles are used, in case India...
  11. Vazir

    Indo-Pak ties: Who will end up on the losing side?

    *facepalm* So you even know why tactical ballistic missiles are even used for? Forget it. You want a dick measuring contest, go somewhere else. I don't engage in troll fights.
  12. Vazir

    Indo-Pak ties: Who will end up on the losing side?

    Um, we do have second strike capability. Even if you dispute Babur 3, India launching missiles would prompt Pakistan to do the same immediately. It's not something done turn by turn, and thinking that Pakistan will wait for a missile to land at Lahore before firing their own is not accurate...
  13. Vazir

    Indo-Pak ties: Who will end up on the losing side?

    Then why is your armoured corps ideally positioned to form thrusts towards these areas? In an Indo Pak war, the land campaigns will entail three areas: AK, upper Punjab, and middle Punjab. Even in '65, IA opened the Lahore front to reduce the pressure and concentration coming from Kashmir, which...
  14. Vazir

    Three-month imprisonment for eating, smoking in public places under Ehtram-e-Ramzan Ordinance

    What I want to say is that discrimination should not happen. The fact that Muslims are at a majority in Pakistan should not mean that their culture should be respected (I don't see how that's done with this law) at the expense of minorities and their rights. The same goes with India: the fact...
  15. Vazir

    Three-month imprisonment for eating, smoking in public places under Ehtram-e-Ramzan Ordinance

    The discrimination is equally condemnable. Thievery sponsored by law, or killing done via vigilantism, I don't care about that. Some Indians will say that at least it's not the law. Some Pakistanis will say that at least it's not killing. You get what I'm saying?
  16. Vazir

    Three-month imprisonment for eating, smoking in public places under Ehtram-e-Ramzan Ordinance

    Sad but true. I'll still remain gray, though. Me and many others. If the establishment want an even bigger brain drain, then they can sleep in their tents and tend to their sheep.
  17. Vazir

    Indo-Pak ties: Who will end up on the losing side?

    Arguable for several reasons. First, both countries benefit greatly from bilateral trade. Second, no diplomatic relations would mean that they're ready to tear apart many families that function because of the diplomatic relations. Third, that would kill any potential cricket prospects, which is...
  18. Vazir

    Three-month imprisonment for eating, smoking in public places under Ehtram-e-Ramzan Ordinance

    Yeah it's insane. The moment Burqa is legally imposed, I'm either out on the streets protesting my arse off, or I'm out of the country first chance I get. Mullah culture sucks.
  19. Vazir

    Three-month imprisonment for eating, smoking in public places under Ehtram-e-Ramzan Ordinance

    It goes both ways. All this has started making people slowly aware of the dangers of extremism. As our government goes more Islamist, our people think more moderate at the same slow rate. Rule of the thumb in Islamic countries: a more conservative government leads to a more liberal people, and...
  20. Vazir

    Three-month imprisonment for eating, smoking in public places under Ehtram-e-Ramzan Ordinance

    True af. Plus, the public opinion system of Pakistan is basically shiit.
Back
Top Bottom