Search results

Yeah we'll see where your concern goes when the Saudi funded madrassas succeed in polluting our people's minds. Any humanist would react with disgust over the way Saudis treat women; like cattle, trading them away as if they are things instead of human beings. And that's the second time I've...

........

Yeah, great idea! Let's divide the Muslim world on Shia-Sunni lines. And I'm not a Shia, I'm a modernist Muslim who despises Al Saud's social policies and their treatment of women. I have no love for Khomeini, but Iran under him is fairly better than KSA domestically. Al Saud hasn't had a decent...

Bt wy u dnt undrstnd me i m tryng 2 sy tht i like iran ppl and m patrot 2 my contry i dnt liv in a cave i live in islambd u r clerly foolsh prson. Come on, act like grown ups, talk like grown ups. Your rhetoric is unimpressive. And please keep your patriot certificate. Patriot =/= nationalist.

I liked the secular Turks better. They were more............tolerant. Or so I'm told.

Eh, I don't mind either one. As long as Masjid Al Haram is intact, the Iranians are more than welcome to overthrow the Al Saud dynasty

*facepalm* RIP restraint and tolerance.

You experience what we call "confirmation bias". Second, FSA is having trouble uniting under their label. So many factions, so much division. And Assad is a tyrant, I know. But SDF is probably the only guys not slaughtering innocent civilians. And it's not Kurdish, it's multi ethnic. You're...

*facepalm*

Um, no. I won't be defending the Lands, and I bet that us Islamabadians ain't just gonna float to Arab and fight.

Well, they won't do that before the Saudis and Turks do that too. I'm no fan of Al Nusra, bruh. I have had it in Syria. Both Iran and Saudis can go f*ck themselves in Syria. To hell with Assad and FSA, I'm all for SDF.

True enough. Right now, there's a defacto Egypt-Israeli-Saudi alliance against Iran unofficially. It's backed by NATO. It's too big of a mess for Pakistan to be in, so I say we stay clear and remain neutral.

Yeah ice cream would be cold, nah? It would interfere. Lol wtf is happening here right now!!!??? [emoji16][emoji16][emoji16]

Yuck, Ahmadinejad. The guy had no room for compromise, and was partially responsible for the sanctions on Iran due to nuclear program. The new guy is much better, I'll say. Sure, he has room for improvement. And I was a skeptic already on Syrian Civil War. Syria is a shithole. Personally I'm...

Whoa whoa. Respectfully, let's not generalize here, sir. It's unfair to assume whether someone is a momin or not, since we all walk on our own paths and have to answer for our actions ourselves. That being said, I agree to an extent. Many in Pakistan have turned to zealot nuts to lead them...

Bush didn't have someone like Mattis at his side. Trump may be an ungrateful arsehole and an idiot, but he has some great military advisors. Bush was surrounded by fools. But we don't need to be much concerned with Trump. He is sounding good for Pakistan, one way or the other.

He's lying! I know for a fact that my friend in America bought his girlfriend an ice cream. He should check his sources!!!!!!!!

Yessir, and would you want some Mountain Dew with it? I'd be happy to provide you some. Seriously, back your allegations with proof, and get some unbiased news sources linked here now. Then we'll talk about "u pakistani then suport ur country against sectarian iranian scum!!!"

The people, led by Jinnah, powered by Iqbal's dream. Nobody else.

Wow. Somebody please get this guy a sandwich.