Search results

good thought........

well it's same meaning just in different words................rest of you part doesn't make any sense , if somethings are wrong in your religion then you should accept it and deny to follow it. all religion have wrong things....just different we have courage to accept it and neglect it...

what's big deal , criticism is not allowed on Islam and quran ? if something is wrong in it then you should accept it as a wrong....

it depends upon how you see it , Israel was country from ancient times it was arab and Muslims who occupied it Jews took back .

"same treatment to all religious people within bounds of country law with humanitarian factor " that's it. we are talking on secular country and secularism. not on Saudi Arabian and sharia law . well i don't care your views about sharia law because it's not my business , you can apply...

well it's................ institutionalized discrimination of non-Muslim minority

well if you follow it within bounds of secular law , no one will ask you . but if some related guy claim in the court then it's the end......

that's it , i was expecting ! you don't understand it and you don't qualify to comment on it . you are member of community which allow anti-secular laws.....which violets Human Rights.

it doesn't work , if some women want stone death for some Islamic crime .. we should allow it ?? it is also arbitration ? so what ? well where Sharia law here doesn't trump secular laws of the land , it's okay follow it ....no one will ask you .

which state/country is secular today according to you(as a member of anti-secular community) ?

law dosen't change because some in particular situation some particular people wants to apply some particular religious law which are not humanitarian .

they work there because ME pigs need them , they have shortage of brain power (pigs always have). ME pigs don't change their laws for them .

your law said kill if some one leaves Islam ! so USA should allow it ? if family agree to kill daughter who left islam , it becomes personal matter ? . if some Muslim women agreed to stoned death USA should allow it ? If some man and women wants to do suicide it's personal matter...

Islam is anti-secular religion itself , which insult non-Muslims , offer them second class treatment .

well it doesn't mean you should apply "anti-human/anti-secular/vampire" Sharia law in your own country ......it must be removed from face of earth............

well Law is only one national , you can follow religion as you wish but you can not bring parallel "laws" to system. such case you have many "laws" in your religion about "kuffurs" kill them convert them . to marry 14 wives is not allowed , to tech christen and Jews are pigs is according to...

it's misunderstanding carried to wiki , because she wear sari and bindi...... due to her secular agenda but she is muslim.

good one ................

according to my knowledge she is Muslim .

i think N. Modi is a great but when it comes to PM i think Sushma Swaraj is better . PM post represents us on international level where i think SS. is more sophisticated , knowledgeable and impressive personality with vocal power. modi should be in strong place in government like Home...