sorry to hear that. I would have thought that mumbai-carnage ruined indo-pak relations. you guys, should remember that pranab is just the messenger and he was giving you message from a country that had just suffered from terror attacks which we strongly believe was carried out from your land...
exactly. you hit nail on the head.
infact, any nation would have done just that, unless, pak is just trying to play a tit-for-tat game by arresting fake agents.
pakistan has always claimed that 'we are also victims of terrorism' on international forum, why havent they claimed ' we are...
you misunderstood me, I support your friendship. go ahead. but dont make india a villian, thats all.
buddy, I will try to explain the indian point of view, then I wont disturb you on this thread. firstly we indians feel we made a lot of effort to help BD when they were fighting for their...
your next post made a lot of sense, and I agree that under some bilateral treaty we should stop violence in kashmir. then after relative peace for a decade or two, conduct a plebiscite. so, that both the countries can move on once and for all.
but, your accusation that india was the aggressor...
I said COULD BE. I was not asserting.
and more importantly, I was not talking about post-independence but pre-independence muslim rule of india.
I have no objection with friendship of yours. all the best. but why run away from past as well. I just mentioned a fact of past, why get so...
I had asked the same question previously in this thread. since, pak only seems to arrest them and then there is no news, I doubt the authenticity of these allegations. if indeed those were RAW operatives being caught left, right and center pak officials and media wouldnt have kept quiet.
I think...
but your case could be one lone case! maybe not arabs, but lot of muslim leaders did commit lot atrocities on non-muslims in india, like jiziya and destructing temples etc.:tsk: many ppl did convert due to such harsh policies and their successors today live all over the world including pak...
do you really believe that zardari govt can stop kiyani if he was serious about striking drones?
the fact is both zardari and kiyani are backed by US, so, dont expect any anti-US move from them.
and pak definitely doesnt have the military might to stand against US.
could you explain your reason for believing that he isnt a muslim? be clear and specific, so that ahmedsid could defend himself from your allegations!
lets get this clear once and for all.:agree:
the only difference between indian independence struggle and 'kashmir freedom struggle' is that in kashmir the presence of violence/terror launched from foreign nations in large doses!
india has only asked pak to stop violence/terror. remember, even violence in indian independence was not...
your last sentence sums up the position of pak, that if india doesnt agree to 'peaceful' resoulution then violence will continue. this amounts to putting gun to head and wat more, it also makes pak a country using terrorism as a state foreign policy.this was commented upon by our PM as well...
expecting a country to stick to the same 'moral position' that it took half a century ago, is not very practical! pak's position must change to accept the new realities of today like the recent election results.:tsk:
this sounds more like a threat: 'accept or violence'.
why should then india bow to such a threat?
whether some groups want to lay down arms or not, india only asks pakistan not to provide such terror groups with infrastructure and not let them use its territory.
thats the only...
the fact of the matter is that: if you could have, you would have.
if pakistan could afford striking drones, it would have done it when the first drone came.
dont insult the intelligence of your army and policy makers by thinking that they are so foolish not to see a straight forward solution...