Search results

oh! finally, the gloves are off. this is wat you want isnt it? break india to pieces. you find different excuses to further that agenda.:rolleyes: but mate india isnt vanishing soon, but BD does have that danger. no no, not from india , but from Bay of Bengal. ecological reports suggest that...

but dont include other innocent americans in your anti-indian bias.:disagree:

yes, buddy boy, but pakistan didnt join US out of sympathy. it joined because it had practically no other choice. whether the world is sypathetic to US' interest or not, US knows how to get ppl do their job. and not much has changed today from 9/11. if anything, you have obama who is much...

kiddo?!! alright, if that makes you feel better.:rolleyes: I didnt trap myself, I put the ball back in china's court, thats all. I didnt say taiwan was not part of china, did I? so, how did I go against chinese interests? and plz you should stop talking on their behalf.:frown: as for the...

I agree, the posture of namaz is known as Vajra Asana or Diamond Posture in yoga and is considered and extremely good asana. It is known as diamond because it make the body specially the abdomen as strong as 'diamond'. muslims, must have become really strong practising this asana 5 times a...

hmm, no this is the begining of indo-US relationship, we shouldnt come across as untrustworthy, but a little, just a little small pressure might be nice.:cool:

:lol: now, you are catering to domestic audience. making mountain out of mole..... you see one kid and make a judgement about entire indian music industry and not to mention classical singing:disagree:

ha ha.... mate, I understand that you trust china blindly, but dont expect them to do the same. you might have given 'blank cheque' to china regarding india, but china wont give you 'veto'. veto will be used by china in its own interest and there are lot of issues that are of mutual interest to...

getting into UN is far more easy than solving kashmir, because to solve kashmir we depend on pakistan to stop supporting violence/terrorism from its territory. dont keep repeating yourself.

china's veto is not yours to claim. :P india is working on its relation with china and we have some mutual interests. anyway, UN without india is a farce and not relevent to the present day world. US should support us, hope hillary can convince obama for us. I think, once india is part of UN...

there you go! back to square one. I guess, pranab has to get talking again and hillary clinton should do some 'condi rice', then when the arm is twisted enough, pak might accept the truth.:tsk:

cant you post without making your hate of hindus so obvious. why do suffer such paranoia? anyway, when you accuse india of meddling in neighbouring countries, do come up with some hard evidence to back it up. the only country that has meddled with its neighbouring countries is pak, it supported...

^ 'bashing india' was not aimed at you but some other members, if you want me to specify them, then I will. we already know the role of nehru and think that he was foolish to promise plebiscite, I think he realised it himself and tried to distance india from the resolution. anyways, lets not...

verry verry good point raised buddy. exactly. these missionaries are funded by foreigner and are only interested in spreading their religion by hook or crook. in the process they hurt a lot of feelings of locals. they dont mind portraying our religion in bad light by giving negative publicity to...

@AM it is right that you have answered some questions(though they havent been accepted completely), but you also showed more flexibility in the traditional stand of pak. so there was some consensus reached. but when some pakistanis start bashing india due to their over zealous emotions by...

I agree. but at the same time it would be silly for pakistan to test the patience or limit of US. I am sure you understand that US cant afford losing this war since, that would leave it with no face for its future interference in any region. but you mentioned good points.:enjoy:

but old questions are repeated since no mutual satisfactory consensus is reached! when some pakistanis regurgitate the old arguements, then indians regurgitate our old stand. if the posts are going to be deleted, I hope that this would be applied to both sides, otherwise the plz let the debate...

should india be worried about wat a nation that lives on aid thinks? :devil: anyways, this is called Diplomacy. not whining and b!tching. though if you like using those words, you are welcome. :frown:

and when you go on this non-cooperation movement, you expect US to sit quiet? when pak joined the war on terror, there was no NATO route, no aid to fight terror, then why did it join? because US 'gave you an offer that you couldnt resist'. get my drift.;)

he said that pak army must be forced to cut off its links with taliban and other terrorists for peace and stability to return to this region. that can be done by not giving any MILITARY aid, pak army must be weakened. but at the same time pakistan must be streghtened by giving NON-military aid...