Search results

Offensive does not imply invasive. Moreover, the whole world understand what "People's Liberation army" did in Tibet. Actions count.

Will Europe Drag Down China, And Why We Like India Over the past few months, investors have been inundated with analysts posturing about the effects of the European debt crisis. The basic questions that continue to worry investors include: To what extent will the crisis spread? –and– Will it...

Davos 2010: The West accepts India and China as equals Once again, China and India are high on the agenda at the World Economic Forum. But something is different. Once they were seen as promising markets - China as workbench and India as services provider - for Western companies. The...

Roach Says India May Outperform Others in Asia-Pacific Region Stephen Roach, chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia, is more optimistic about economic growth prospects in India than China, saying the country may outperform others in the Asia-Pacific region. “India is a more balanced economy than...

Harry Dent: India a Better Long-Term Bet than China IU.com: In your latest book, you show different demographic trends favoring emerging markets over the next several years, don’t you? Dent: The strongest demographic trends – countries with growing workforces and growing consumer patterns...

India is going to pull the world out of crisis. China is already at its peak and its growth will only fall here on. Check out the video at about 40:00.

Call me when its set in stone. Indians tend to overspeculate.

Precisely why the US threatened to invade NK in the 21st century :rofl: LOL! You're arguing about bits and pieces now? Your behavior is pathetic, almost as pathetic as the rut US is in now economically. :rofl:

There were empty threats to NK and were not carried forward because of Chinese pressure. I'm not your history teacher. Like I said, get a perspective. :rofl:

Bullshit, There was no official statement by anyone saying anything about sales embargoes. Heck, France and Germany who are nato members sells China weapons.

Speculation.

Good that you learned that US cannot live without middle east and are just denying that 20% is not significant! :rofl::rofl: Yep, that is why NK was invaded and the iran sanctions were watered down. LOL :rofl: :rofl: You need perspective. :rofl::rofl:

So much for saying that middle east contribution is not significant! 20% is very significant. It will become even more significant since the English Channel is increasingly depleting. :rofl: Go ahead, try and invade Iran. There is a reason people like retards like you are not taken...

where does it say AESA? Let's not count chickens before they hatch.

There is no cost benefit analysis. Battle lines haven't been drawn yet

Not everything can be quoted. It could be personal opinion of the editor.

its just basic math. Let me do it for ya. top 5 exporters which is 600,000 barrels in your list make up for 64% of US oil imports in April 2010. So, Saudi Arabia + Iraq + Kuwait = 200,000 barrels which is 33% of 64% = 21.12% Thank you proving my point. :rofl::rofl::rofl: S-300 missiles come...

Good point, I get what you're hinting at. China will not be able to conduct aggressive patrolling and intrude in Indian territory or India will bring it up in SCO. But frankly, I'm not sure how much China respects things like these.

:rofl: What is the engine of US economy? :rofl: The S-300 comes under sanctions. Use 'google'.

This thread is funny and needs to be locked.