Search results

You gotta be kidding me with a statement like that. Any further argument trying to convince you Yeager's bias is pointless. You have already made up your mind. It is no worth explaining stuff to someone just doesn't want to understand. You are contradicting your self here - just when in post...

The PAF had nearly 120 (8 operational squadron's), F-86 Sabers at the start of the 1965 war, another 90 aircraft where inducted immediately afterward. The Sabers then where the best dog fighting aircraft available. The PAF having had the Sabers for nearly a decade before the start of the war had...

Dude that statement is an extract from the - United States Library of Country Studies. Do you even know what that is!!?? Never denied that there where losses on the Indian side. But this statement that i came across talked about Pakistani losses. What can i do about that??

The very fact that GHQ tried to suppress the book, makes it clear that the PA has something to hide about the 1965 fiasco. That's the point i am trying to make. The rest is up to you weather you want to buy it or not. The article clearly states that the book if published could have burst the...

Care to name the books written by so called military analyst. Btw, it was Pakistani Intelligence which was providing support to insurgents in India's North East since the mid 1950's. I can name the book if you want.

Weather Musharraf allegedly requested the title of the book to be changed or not, one thing is for certain that that the Pakistan Army is certainly trying to hide something by keeping the book out of pubic circulation. If indeed 1965 was a military victory as claimed by the PA then why shy...

According to the United States Library of Congress Country Studies: The war was militarily inconclusive; each side held prisoners and some territory belonging to the other. Losses were relatively heavy--on the Pakistani side, twenty aircraft, 200 tanks, and 3,800 troops. Pakistan's army had...

Read the article carefully, it clearly suggests that the book is about the MYTH of the victory claimed by the Pakistan Army in 1965. Musharraf even wanted the name of the book changed to exclude the world MYTH. It cant be more lucid than that. As for your point regarding the book containing...

Israel 'has right to rein in Iran' Israel has a sovereign right to decide how to deal with Iran's nuclear ambitions whether the United States agrees or not, Joe Biden, the US vice-president, has said. In an interview on ABC's "This week" programme on Sunday, Biden said Israel can...

^^^ Link please

China's Uighurs face fasting restrictions Al Jazeera English - News

China's government has blamed Uighur exiles for inciting a riot in the country's western Xinjiang region that it says left more than 100 people dead. The official Xinhua news agency said the deaths came in the city of Urumqi on Sunday after a protest against the government's handling of an...

Musharraf buys all copies of sensitive '65 war book ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Army general headquarters has purchased all 22,000 copies of a sensitive book by a former Inter Services Intelligence(ISI) chief on the myth of the victory claimed by the Pakistan Army in the 1965 war against India...

Army attemps to prevent book sales Lahore: The Army has bought all copies of a book written by a former intelligence chief fearing it may explode the myth victory in the 1965 war with India, a source has said. The source said the General Head Quarters (GHQ) of the Pakistan Army bought up...

Ayub misled nation in ’65 war: Nur Khan ISLAMABAD — The 1965 war was based on a lie in which Ayub Khan and his generals misled the nation that India rather than Pakistan had provoked the war and that “we were the victims of Indian aggression”, Air Marshal Nur Khan, a...

Thanks for the nickname but be rest assured i wont stoop down to your level. And ya, you still haven't answered the question kid.

As i suspected you have no substantial point to offer except flaming. I had asked you a direct question about your so called edge in 65, but you prefer to burrow your head in the sand to avoid the storm instead.

Looks like that to me. Otherwise it would be rather stupid of you people not use your edge and allow the Indians to take the largest military surrender after World War 2!!!

Nemesis, Buddy i avoided commenting on that as it will give an excuse to some people to hijack the thread and make it another flame war. I request you to do the same, ignore the provocation. I have asked this dude above a straight question lets see if he answers that or simply chooses to...

Dude calm down. My question was based on your claim that the Pakistan military had a edge in 1965. All i asked is - how come the edge that you had, just disappeared in 6 years?