Search results

I have read your posts on a Pakistan related thread, you seem to be very knowledgeable in history and social anthropology. I liked reading your posts.

remember 1971? Nixon and Kissinger both urged China to send troops deep into India with assurances that Marines and USAF would provide all types of support. that is why I said China missed 1971 opportunity.

we will make more enclaves and give them too if they ask because the threat is India. now got it?

can you join the Indian military to fight China? please answer, Yes.

minor issues. negligible. the threat is India.

China needs diplomatic support, not military, because the solution isn't and shouldn't be military oriented.

once again you have started your trolling.

except india no body has any land dispute with China. there are some water and small uninhabitable island chain disputes between China and Japan and between China and Vietnam. my strategy says China should make some concessions to them on the condition that they will support China against india...

listen, blood and cultural ties don't always make alliances, neither do they make hostility. two Koreans are Koreans but why they are at war with each other? Chinese don't share blood and cultural ties with Pakistanis, still why they are so friendly towards each other? there are many factors...

you see, a good military strategist should avoid doing some great blunders. one of them is that a good military strategist should avoid making and defeating a wrong enemy, no matter how easily he can defeat and boost his self ego. a good military strategist must not select an enemy on the basis...

post reported for insulting a member. i told you, when you address me, address correctly.

in the long run, Vietnam and Philippines will be China's allies, not India. go figure. let me give one clue: size matters.

a war that leads to enemy's disintegration is what I have been talking about. its sad to know that my superior IQ brothers couldn't get the point. it seems I had to explain everything like telling school students that it is due to the earth's gravitational force that the apples fall from the...

unnecessary

not a news to me. sources told me long before Medvedev's visit. I was talking about it much before such reports published.

going by that logic, Russia and others should not have made counter attacks to recover the territories once occupied by the Nazis. they should have said, OK, since the Nazis have taken over our lands, lets just forget about it. what a logic!?

do you know self-complacency is self-destructive? yes, China is still powerful but when India will become more powerful what will happen to China? for example, if India becomes Permanent UNSC member, it would be impossible for China to get her lands back, rather china will be forced to give...

GOI no longer accepts Tibet as part of China. get your facts correct. India refused to include the usual mention of the “one China principle” and “Tibet Autonomous Region as part of the territory of the People’s Republic of China” in the joint statement. Pak wall splits India, China -...

no one suggested that China should destroy india, but China would manage India and get her lands back as soon as possible because tomorrow India will become too powerful to be managed. an offensive strategy doesn't mean full fledged war. but the more you delay, the more acute the threat will...

even when enemies split Tibet from China, you guys will say that is not enough reason to fight the enemy. then they will split Xinjiang and you will repeat the same, then they will split Inner Mongolia and you will keep repeating, then they will come to your doorstep... but it will too late and...