What's new

Search results

  1. N

    Shankaracharya Hill renamed as Takht-e-Suleiman by secular ASI

    What desert stuff? Was the lingam removed from the temple and taken to desert.
  2. N

    Since Earliest Historical Times Hinduism Was Never Popular in Pakistan

    Mlechha as a racist slur is still used in majority of Indian villages, though its usage in the cities have reduced. And the fact that you people do not care about the sensitivities of Indian minorities and insult them and persecute them at will because you are in majority, bares your racist...
  3. N

    Shankaracharya Hill renamed as Takht-e-Suleiman by secular ASI

    Aren't you embarrsed of living in India - after all India was also created by Abrahamic entities.
  4. N

    Since Earliest Historical Times Hinduism Was Never Popular in Pakistan

    The word Mohammaden was used as Negro, Nigger etc for the blacks. It implied that the people worshiped Mohammed only, which was and is highly offensive to all Muslims. I have not seen any mainstream Indian media outlet using such term except the extremist and fundamentalist Indian Hindu outlets...
  5. N

    Since Earliest Historical Times Hinduism Was Never Popular in Pakistan

    First of all let me protest in the strongest possible term your use of the word Mohammadan. This was used as an extreme racist slur by the British to describe Islam and Muslims as they did not accept Islam as a religion. Use of such religious slurs speaks volumes of your racist orientation. This...
  6. N

    Since Earliest Historical Times Hinduism Was Never Popular in Pakistan

    It is indeed very funny that majority of Indian expats work in Arab countries for money and then abuse them back home. They also accuse Pakistanis of being Arabs which the Pakistanis never have been. They also accuse Pakistanis of converting from their original religion, presuming it to be...
  7. N

    Since Earliest Historical Times Hinduism Was Never Popular in Pakistan

    Instead of resorting to rhetorical and baseless expression, please prove your viewpoint with logical explanation and response. The facts and figures that I quoted point squarely to the reality that existed at the time of independence in 1947. The fact remains that the Hindus and Sikhs initiated...
  8. N

    Since Earliest Historical Times Hinduism Was Never Popular in Pakistan

    If you think that it were only the Hindus and Sikhs who suffered, you are grossly mistaken or have not been told the complete story. The atrocities were initially perpetrated against the Muslims in Indian Punjab and hundreds of thousands were killed and large tracts of areas were ethnically...
  9. N

    India should take a lesson from what China thinks and does

    The legacy of a governing system. One system disrupts life to hail the advancement for modernity and the other keeps life in limbo to avoid modernity for so-called survival. Ironic indeed.
  10. N

    India should take a lesson from what China thinks and does

    The scortched earth defence policy from a defensive Indian mindset may be changing in certain areas along India China border but certainly not from all the areas. Unfortunate as it is, it needs a changed mindset to change the mindset.
  11. N

    Makran range

    They are lucky that they did, otherwise they would have been evicted like the Porugese from Goa. As beautiful and enchanting as intractable. A natural defence against any Indian amphibious assault.
  12. N

    Since Earliest Historical Times Hinduism Was Never Popular in Pakistan

    What I said was that since over 9000 years of known history, Pakistani landmass has remained a distinctly separate geographic and political entity except for the Maurya, Muslim and British rules where Indus and Genges domains were governed as one geographic and political entity. Because the era...
  13. N

    Since Earliest Historical Times Hinduism Was Never Popular in Pakistan

    Sub-continent was never India till different non-Indians, during a phase of history, for the purpose of temporary geographical identification, started calling it India, Hindu, Hindustan etc. This happened during various phases of historical evolution. Initially, it had nothing to do with...
  14. N

    Since Earliest Historical Times Hinduism Was Never Popular in Pakistan

    This thread was to highlight the historical aspects regarding the populist and false Indian assertion which has also been supported by many Indian writers and historians that Hinduism was the popular religion in areas of Pakistan. History does not support this assertion. This was challenged by...
  15. N

    Since Earliest Historical Times Hinduism Was Never Popular in Pakistan

    Interestingly, you state that the idea of India is based on cultural unity and only recently translated into political unity, albeit with some loss of land in the west and east which I believe is a reference to 1947. What you are stating about the political unity is not very different from what...
  16. N

    Since Earliest Historical Times Hinduism Was Never Popular in Pakistan

    The identity crisis is not being faced by the people of Pakistan. It is the Indians who have an identity crisis as they are the ones that identify themselves with someone else’ identity, which is not theirs in the first place. Why are you people so angry on creation of Pakistan, which was a...
  17. N

    Since Earliest Historical Times Hinduism Was Never Popular in Pakistan

    Hinduism was neither popular nor was in majority in Pakistan since the earliest times. Even during the times of Brahmin persecution of Buddhism, the areas that comprised Pakistan did not convert en masse to Hinduism. At the time of partition in 1947, according to the UN figures the population of...
  18. N

    Since Earliest Historical Times Hinduism Was Never Popular in Pakistan

    Pakistan from 3000 BC to the present: 1. Indus Valley Civilization: 3000-1500 B.C. i.e. about 1500 yrs. Independent, separate from India. 2. Aryan period: 1500-522 B.C. i.e. about 978 yrs. Independent, separate from India. 3. Small semi-independent states: 522-326 B.C. i.e. about...
Back
Top Bottom