Search results

i dont support us hegemony. But we must remember if any people is at receiving end of tyrannical regimes, who is going to help them? Britain? China? Russia?

Well, i think this thread is kinda unfair on Americans.. You have taken only economic parameters to gauge development. What is important is that Americans chose a way of life( democratic) and then worked to economic prosperity with it. On the other hand Chinese followed a different way of life...

you seem to have an inflated opinion of China as it is best friend. FYI, china is viewed with fear and distrust in most parts of the world.. Most of world would rather continue to live under American hegemony than chinese hegemony.. And last time i checked china had border disputes with almost...

IMO, the era of taliban rule in Afghanistan is over.. Even if Americans pull out it'd hard to imagine a Taliban takeover under present scenario. Americans are not cutting and running as in vietnam. They are merely withdrawing in phases.

sir, succeeded in what? Remember.. All good things must come to an end.. It'd be only a matter of time till India decides enough is enough..

sigh.. Its just that you are only too willing to walk into the sunset under a mushroom cloud.. We are not.. We got a future man.. Thats why each time we dither..

sir, i dont think a naval blockade would warrant a crossing of nuclear threshold.. Besides you seem to lay your country's future in the chance of chinese militarily intervening.. IMHO i dont think Chinese will interfere in a india pak war.. Firstly india, pak and china are nuclear powers...

you'd be outta your mind to attack India over naval blockades.. I dont think Commies in Beijing are stupid. 61 war is old history pal. Besides that war only showed offensive operation by China and Defensive positioning by India..

no no no. Most of these groups are not secessionist in nature and most are not armed too.. Besides small flare up dont really matter. You dont understand the way india functions.. India is too large and unwieldy for any of this to matter..precisely why we never had army rule till now.. Army...

sir, my comments about blocking of pakistani ports were a war time scenario.. Please refer back. That is in case war breaks out between india and pakistan.. Of course if war breaks out it'll be soon nuclear.. India'd be daft to block pakistan in peace times.. How could you ever assume so...

oh. I'm well aware of the ground realities. I would like to point out to you that india being a democracy and a free country anyone and everyone can form a group or organisation that calls for separatism.. Most of these organisations may exist, but only in the fringes and do not enjoy any level...

In my opinion, indian ocean will become india's ocean in the near future.. There is presence of foreign navies in indian ocean like American and British but they are not antagonistic to indian interests nor is there a conflict of interest.. As for blocking international sea lanes, why in world...

Your information regarding these organisation are wrong.. As tshering pointd out only ULFA and NCNM are secessionist.. Rest are just splinter groups. Some groups i haven't really heard ever. Some are asking for extending their state limits.Man, you have gone through some painstaking work to...

Pakistan ye kab samjhenge, ki wo kitne hi mujahideen ya fidayeen ko kashmir bheje, chahe jihad hi rachaye, india kisi bi haal pe kashmir ko chodenge nahi.. It isnt imperialism or false pride or desire subjugate kashmiris.. Its a question of india's very existence, its existance as a federal...

keep on dreaming dude..

Well.. I think, for pakistan to progress, it will have to leave its obsession with india.. This india fear complex, though partly justified, has been cultivated by military rulers to maintain their grip over pakistan.. Situation has become such that the only glue holding ur country is anti...