Search results

Keyword: Example You start your argument with an assumption and then you portray the conclusion as a fact. Nowhere does the article talk about Mr. B's or his corporation's Earnings before taxes and Earning's after taxes. What is Mr. B's stake in the ownership. What is his personal contribued...

Diplomatic sabre rattling is how I describe it. After all we do need bargaining chips in a negotiation, don't we?

You are talking absolutes in an article mentioning percentages. Even if he made $100 in income. Fact remains that he is donating 90 of those to charity. and fact also remains that Americans are bound to view it positively. Im still waiting for your answer on why they wouldn't.

But you accuse your govt. of lying all the time. What makes you believe their word now? I say he is an Indian Sikh, named Amar Sikh.

Seriously? You are now going to stoop so low as to cast doubt on the earning abilities of a successful entrepreneur in America? I mean seriously? God! You would really shoot yourself in the head if i told you what some of my classmates are currently making around the world, let alone America...

hmm...so I do stand corrected. Wouldn't be afraid of apologizing. Though I must say I'am really short of time to do my own research on this. But it's ok, I'll take your word for now and leave the rebuttal to my fellow Indians some of whom have better facts and figures on the issue.

Why on Earth would we challenge anybody, my friend? We have Kashmir. We have Siachen. We have Arunachal. We have all we want. We are a status quo or a Defensive power. We do not seek Tibet that we will go and attack China.

Clutching to straws now, are we? Don't have anything to say about the perception of the American public, do you? After all, the whole point you disput4ed was how the American public would take it and I told you that they would take it positively just like they take all kid of charity done upon...

They don't have to lie to do that. Indian people will support them come what may. The ones in China and Pakistan, those who matter, and not internet fanboys, already know the capabilities and shortcoming of the Indian Army and of their own Armies. ...and they still don't dare to come and...

Recognize our positions in Siachen and have all the peace in the world. Simple. But you won't do that because you are afraid of accepting your defeat in Siachen.

What else is he supposed to say.

Yes. You are right. However, you can always provide your troops with the best of equipment in the world and we do. Unless you can tell me that PA had a similar record of death count in Siachen before this particular incident as does IA, your argument is nullified. Point is, your Generals...

...till 1997. ...and then we started taking a series of steps which gradually reduced the death count on Siachen. Now it has come down to zero. Again I say, if your Generals are incompetent to take such good care of their men, I'm not sure how you can blame India for that.

I have already devoted some of my precious time on your worthless apprehension. You are assuming that the American public doesn't value charity when done upon people other than their own. Perhaps you have only met the waylayers in America. I have been fortunate to meet better Americans.

Yes indeed. I don't know what have been your experiences with American people, but I, personally, have met some very gracious American citizens who laud good work whether it is done in India or Uganda. Americans value charity and community service no matter whom it is done upon. That is my...

So when Bill gates does charity in India, he is to be lauded. Steve Waugh works with Kolkata NGO's and he must be the next avatar of Lord Vishnu. Warren Buffett donates money to India orgs. and for that he must be eulogised. ...but when an India-Origin man does the same, he must be put...

Read the first clause of the first sentence of my post. I'm not even asking you read an entire sentence. I know you might be a little uncomfortable with English, hence, I'm taking it easy for your sake. I'm only asking you to read the first clause, not even the entire sentence.

There no need to even discuss that. Any third party mediation is unacceptable. Period.

Ctrl+F 'Siachen', No results found. :enjoy: So much for reading comprehension skills. Gosh! Such wasn't the US education system the last I saw it! :lol:

unless you can prove to me that that was in Siachen, your comment would easily qualify for the ignorance of the highest degree award. India has not lost a troop in Siachen for the past 8 years. We are not responsible if your Generals are incompetent of taking good care of their men and provide...