Search results

I think i shared the latest article with you. She has not been charged with anything.

I doubt it. I have not seen him saying he support such a sedition! .. .Can you share such a link (At best i have seen him describing root of Balochi issue .. not supporting such a sedition). Going by your standard, we have seen Kashmiri separatists leaders openly talking about secession. is'nt it?

You did not read the dates of your and mine articles .. Did you?

I'm yet to see a Pakistani openly talking about secession of a Pakistani state. Let me know which of your citizen has dared to say so (Forget a Minority Hindu saying so in your country ... Poor fella will be fried alive!)

OK .. Read it here.. The Hindu : News / National : Chidambaram on Arundhati: Not taking action is also an action Happy Now?

Good. So, you see, we Hindu's have been very vocal about the Gujrat Riots.

Well, my point is that people will be always be labelled as Gaddar for speaking against state. Same applies to Pakistan as well. As for Mrs.Roy, she continues to use her freedom of speech provided by my constitution, to the limit that she is probably the only Indian i have know who has not been...

Sure. Will get back to you. But any video with racial color to it , is a show stopper for me.

Bilal : I have never watched it. My friend did. I shall take his feedback. Or maybe you can share link of testimonies of goverment officials.

oh is it so.... Just check comments from youtube ... Mr.Hoodbhoy has been called "Gaddar" on lot many shows , sometimes by Zaid. Sometimes by government officials. As for second video, please understand that it was Teesta personal opinion. Not a statement recorded by a witness who claims he...

Sir, where in that second video does it prove that instructions came from Mr.Modi ?

Sir, has similar accusation not been levied against people like Pervez Hoodbhoy too? ... Does that make whole of Pakistani Society intolerant? I did not see any evidence in that Video that serves as proof of Modi's Guilt!!!

Bilal: First, how does the Video prove that he incited Mob to riot against the Muslims? or his inaction against the state police? And the TwoCircles states exactky what i have been saying. That the SIT could only conclude that Mr.Modi could only be found guilty of not taking the riots...

Mate: Are you doing this deliberately? ... I explained to you that being a acting CM he cant be impeached by the central government. And that Presidential orders are needed. I also explained that he cant be impeached because you dont have one to testify. Oh, we went one step ahead. the SIT...

Bilal: I will not repeat. Explain HOW HAS IT BEEN UNEQUIVOCALLY proven that he was an accomplice?

Sir, Please dont take a moral high ground. As i said, for you to even start impeachment against Mr.Clinton, you needed Miss.Lewinsky. Do you have anything similar in Mr.Modi's case? .....No. Nothing. SIT, under Supreme Court directive, investigated him (Obviously the Congress Government wanted...

Do you understand the meaning of Prima Facie evidence .. or Innocent Until Guilty?

NO. It has not been proven. I have been myself critical of Mr.Modi. But , there does not exist a single person who has come forward to testify in front of SIT. Just you saying so, does not make up a evidence acceptable in court of law. He has been however questioned by the SIT. But as i said...

Its not same token. He Was and Is acting CM of a State. The central government cant impeach him. And why do you color the accused as Muslims. As if they are arrested only because they are muslims (You do have people arrested from right wing HIndu political parties as well).

Mate, for Clinton to be impeached, you needed a Monica ready to testify. Show us one person, in any Video Form, who has claimed direct orders from Modi. I shall await.