Search results

And China has learned a valuable lesson, that China must always watch her borders who knows when India is going to implement a forward policy into chinese land. China also learned another valuable lesson. That indians cannot be reasoned with, when Nehru started advancing into disputed...

Only a small minority speak Sanskrit, just like how some Americans can speak spanish. This proves nothing

It was just to prove that historically Tibet has nothing to do with india but they have been living together with chinese for quite some time.

Look at where Indians are normally located, notice how they have a lot of grey in their circles? thats the L haplo group it makes up the majority of the people who live in India and they are the only two groups to have it.

The DNA map was only to show that Tibetans had 0% Hindu DNA. Therefore it proves that never once in history did Tibetans have any significant relationship with Hindus. They never shared a cluture, they never lived together, they never shared the same language.

Except when The British left they gave all their territories 3 options 1. Join India 2. Join Pakistan 3. Remain independent or join any other country that wants them Who do you think made the decision for these Tibetans? It was a couple of Indian guys who were put in charge of these areas.

And they have buddhists in China that have these areas as Holy places. They have millions of people that travel all over the world to mecca even though it is not in their country. If China owned these lands the religious people will still be able to travel to their holy places. However...

Look at the map closer Uygurs have a good amount of chinese DNA

This isn't my argument. My argument with genetics was to show that Tibetans have more chinese DNA while having 0% Hindu DNA, thus this shows that never once has Tibet ever affiliated with India in history. I don't care if China gets these lands or not, I just want to know why is India...

If Akasai Chin and Arunachal Aradesh have always been part of India then why do they have no Hindu DNA yet so much chinese DNA? Why do they write in chinese characters instead of Hindi characters? The bottomline is that these areas have always belonged to Tibet and not once in history have...

Looks usually = genetics also look at the Haplo group map See that large slice of blue? That is Han DNA while Tibetans have almost 0% of the grey which is Indian DNA See that sign in the back? those characters are chinese. These people are gentically chinese, culturally chinese...

The problem is that you do not view these people as chinese, I do. I have studied this matter extensively and the people living in these areas have almost the same DNA as us and almost no DNA in common with the average Hindu that makes up the majority of India. I would not have a problem if...

How was it China's fault? all experts agree on the same thing, the chinese wanted to negotiate, Nehru refused and sent his troops in to claim the disputed territory declaring that he will drive out all chinese. China's only goal was to keep the Indians out of the disputed territory and once they...

http://www.dnaindia.com/world/report_china-india-and-the-fruits-of-nehru-s-folly_1101845 Another Indian historian posting the truth about what really happened

Nehru had no intention of leaving. Nehru entered disputed territory, set up fortifications while the chinese begged him to leave. What were the chinese supposed to do? allow Nehru to keep advancing his fortifications? rediff.com: rediff.com Special: Who was to blame for the 1962 war? Was it...

Why can you not disprove my arguments? Even your beloved Reddit says that Indians are wrong. Even history says you are wrong, these lands have always belonged to tibet never once in history to India.

This land is being fought over by India and China. Based on historical claims. Just look at their eyes and you can see that they are of mongoloid race while the indians are caucasoid race. Just because part of Tibet used to belong to Britain does not mean it belong to India. Or does the...

How about you respond to my post Arunachal Aradesh was signed over to Britain (through coercion IN EVERY COURT OF LAW FORCING SOMEONE TO SIGN A CONTRACT MAKES IT ILLEGAL), not to India. So why should India keep it?

Look at the people who live in Arunachal Pradesh Do these people look Indian or Chinese?

rediff.com: rediff.com Special: Who was to blame for the 1962 war? Was it India or China who initiated the conflict? Check this article, it explains who REALLY started the war. The article is by your beloved Rediff, and even they admit that India was the aggressor And Even wikipedia...