Search results

1. its carrier not career 2. can you please elaborate what good a naval fighter would do without carrier. i mean its better to station 2 squads of air force for specificaly that role. it would save the costs of opening an entire new division, separate training , trainers and schools...

and what about. the heinous crimes your officers were doing there. all the rapes and. murders all the hate of hindus the lack of feedom and what about denying then a fair chance to form goverment . what about the crimes of gen. tikka khan . insurgents fighting cruel rulers and generals was also...

Actually french are really bad sellers militarily or domestically . They are the only ones except usa to have nuclear power aircraft carriers , they have the worlds best non 5g naval fighter and one the best in air superiority fighters , they have catapult launching tech. great helos , LHD's...

Rather than having more no. of nukes pak should look to diversify its arsenal to include SLBM and Air Launched Nukes.

good thing that it is more well defended than abbotabad coz. that would have gotten me worried

. and bringing in 26-11 and 9-11 b/w 1971 and 1965. is pure genius right?

Q. What is common b/w 1971 , 9-11 and 26-11 Ans. @FaujHistorian knows absolutely nothing about either one of them @FaujHistorian please dont compare terrorist attacks like 9-11 and 26-11 with wars like '71 it is hurtful and rude to the people who lost their lives in the war and were...

Gripen is a very good low cost fighter so it will get orders F-16 are good but most of orders are by us allies who are under pressure by U.S like the recent buying of F35 by South Korea Typhoon also got very little orders except member states Rafale failure is more political than technical i...

who gives a damn about the vienna convention . U.S are worried about the underpayment of an indian maids wages by an indian but not about the hundreds they killed in our neighbouring state or the prisinors tortured at Gitmo. If U.S doesent care about deaths about innocent civillians then why...

As per US Marshals law the above is only allowed when the subject is carrying weapons or is a threat to national security

You're a bit wrong here The 3 parts that could result in cold war the most were 1.Cuban Missile Crises 2.Able Archer Exercise 3.Stanislav Petrov case [ THE MAN WHO SAVED THE WORLD] Able Archer 83 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Stanislav Petrov - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Last time i checked in this forum no gives a damn about which country and which topics the discussion is about . Ex. A thread about Indian poverty or indian space and nuk. programme will have more pakistani members than indian ones

Ok a choice for you 1. 60,000-80,000 men dead and their families ruined , wives widowed , children orphaned , mother's destroyed OR 2. Surrender of 90,000 men and yes a bit of shame but saving men from dying and getting them back alive. P.S A Great General is one who...

They produced 30 a month. phew ...so thats why they never wanted the cold war to end. The facility is huge Lockheed Martin have a complete embargo on us and worlds market it seems

The figures from world bank are for 2011 january . it is nearly 2014 january so there has been a decrease in that time interval as well

EVERYONE IS COMPARING REAL DEMOCRACY WITH IDEAL DICTATORSHIP ; YOU SHOULD COMPARE REAL WITH REAL AND IDEAL WITH IDEAL . REAL DEMOCRACY CAN BE COMPARED WITH DICTATORSHIP IN STATES LIKE LIBYA , EGYPT, ZIMBABWE; CUBA , SOUTH AFRICA OR INDIAN STATES LIKE W.BENGAL IDEAL DICTATORSHIP CAN BE...

AND YOUR POINT IS ? IT IS A REALLY POOR CHOICE AT THAT cost ;if they wanted advanced trainer they could have gone for worlds best in BAE HAWK or if they wanted a light jet they could have gone for JF-17 .OR GRIPEN

Of course Saab GRIPEN will win it is made by a great company with yrs. of history of making fighter planes ;Tejas is just our 2nd attempt after Hal Marut and it will improve much after the program goes on but what is more important is the knowledge and technical know-how it brings to us because...

It is miles ahead of that junk but not their junk coz. there still dreaming about J-10 and havent bought it yet so its still 4-5 yrs away from them and by that time MKII will be up and running

after full testing of K-4 the submarine launch tech. will be more or less on par with land based so development of A-6 and K-5 (SLBM varient of A5 OR A-6) will be simaltaneous. P.S. do you think K -4 IS SLBM LAUNCHED VERSION OF A-4 AND THEREFORE K-5 MUST BE SLBM LAUNCHED VERSION OF A-5