Search results

our nukes are 75 times less powerful than so small area of 1.3 km broad and 7 km long area will be severely contaminated and that would be small area of 11 sq km. Nuclear winter woun't set in our case due to sub kilo ton yield . We will win the war, gov won't collapse since...

I know about India more than you and there are no such thing as triple air defence system and neither as harbanspather missile series that are hypersonic and with a range of about 1500km

But I never read any news about that , can you provide me the link for that source ??

I think your mommy dropped you headward,since India is not developing any missile by the name of harbanspather missile .

Triple layer air defence system ??When did this happen ?? Who ??Is Pakistan developing those missiles ??

I think it must be Mao Zedong ,papa of China.

What about fighter jet launched nukes ??And obviously cruise missiles.

Radioactive parts carried by Wind also has very limited region to propagate hence the fallout would do so only till distance of of max 10 km not more than that for 200kt bombs in the dir of wind and that area would remain as quartined zone for ever . Very very large area will remain...

You are welcome.

Samsung Galaxy ??

NEW DELHI: In a day of high drama, law minister Ashwani Kumar resigned on Friday following the resignation of railway minister Pawan Kumar Bansal. Ashwani Kumar was under fire from the opposition after the Supreme Court came down heavily on the CBI for allowing the law ministry to vet the draft...

It's different in our case sir. Their combined nuke warhead number is in the excess of 15000 and not like our 200kt small nukes. They have real destruction power of 100Mt bombs like Tsar. Our case is very different.

Nothing left to counter valid arguments ??:omghaha:

What are you talking about , India is not island country like Japan. At most you would be able to take out some cities and some strategic locations and nothing more than that. But being small Pakistan will be more affected and hence loose the war.

This is not of topic , you aske about balkanisation and henec I reminded you about 71_ In 47 there was no war and no foreign country had invaded India , and no one dictated terms, it was mutually acceptable. I actually think it was good riddance.

What was 71 then ??:lol:

Sources you are taking about are unconfirmed ones and they themselves dub it as RUMOURED.

Why won' that work like that ,it's simple calculation. Yes it would damage very less area of Pakistan , but you will loose the war and your country would be Balcanised .

On record ??Where give me link, what I understood after reading about that it was rumour .

Our political leadership was grilled hard by coallition mostly dovish partners to not to escalate from our side . you will soon see change of guard in Delhi then try your luck to pull something like Kargil or even Mumbai.