Search results

I don't think the SC can do that. Either he's Sadiq or he's not.

Is the security higher than 20th April? Maybe that's a sign of things to come.

It's a political gimmick. It would be a breach of national security even to mention that there is a threat which only 5 people know about.

Dirty politics and dirtier politicians.

I am going to get much abuse for this but from the judgment notes, the SC's questions were not answered by the JIT in a way that would lead to DQ. The Iqama issue may swing the balance but I'm of the opinion that Nawaz will get away and eventually get a clean chit from the trial court after...

It's judgment day tomorrow. I hope we aren't disappointed.

Collective punishment is contrary to the Islamic and modern principles of justice. You can't punish a baby for the sins of his parents.

If the leave for a holiday before the verdict, I will have serious doubts about the intentions of the judges.

It's 6PM and no word of a verdict tomorrow. That means the judges will be off on a holiday leaving the entire nation in limbo. Highly irresponsible.

The supplementary cause list has been releases but does not mention it.

So it's not happening tomorrow. The country shall remain in limbo until the judges are done with their vacation.

It would be irresponsible for the judges to go on leave while the government machinery has become non existent and the economy is under severe pressure.

Justice Izaj Afzal least likely to DQ, going by his judgment and lack of remarks during the hearing.

I agree with the sentiments of the video. If the judges do not DQ Nawaz Sharif on Friday, they might as well legalize corruption and fraud.

I mean to ask if there is a monetary penalty for that? Or does the entire party get disqualified from contesting elections?

Thanks. What happens if the ECP/SC decide they violated the laws? What is the penalty and for whom?

So it looks like a Thursday verdict is not happening now. Correct?

The judges have already penned down their reasoning. All the have to do is fit the new evidence with that. It's not a long process. Coming to the discussion about 3/5 bench: it was an "order of the Court" and not "judgment of the Court." That means it's not final. A judgment is final. And...

IK's case looks so frivolous and I wonder how they're even hearing it unless there is some political motive.

Do you have any source to back your claim that the final judgment will be made by a 5-member bench apart from Arif Hameed & Sabir Shakir? They've spread too much fake and sensational news over the years to be credible. The PML guys are saying the final judgment will be made by the three-judge...