Just shows the intellect of you.
Goa too was a state which only existed because of the goodwill of the british. Goa didn't even have a proper military. They only existed because the british wanted it to exist.
Why not half a squadron free F-35, when free 70 million dollar F-16's, and free 40 million dollar upgrades for the entire F-16 fleet? Is that a LOL as well to you?
Well stranger things have happened. With idiots in Washington, anything could happen.
If offered F-35 free like they did the F-16, would pakistan say no? They would eagerly get it.
Yes, there wouldn't have been a patel without the british because there wouldn't have been a single rule in the land in the first place. Say for instance the british had only conquered half of india and the other half was a powerful country of its own and not a vassal state, do you think patel...
It didn't exist. But it slowly built up when the freedom struggle was going on across India. If there was no freedom struggle, and the british had just left us suddenly, do you seriously believe all those kings in the kingdoms which existed as vassals under the british would have just thrown...
Actually that means in WVR, pakfa has more advantage than F-22 because it will be more manuverable. In BVR it is at an disadvantage because F-22 can see it first.
Its not about qualifications. Its about what would have happened if the british just left us and we were without any freedom struggle. We certainly would not have just bonded together in a vaccum to form a single nation.
Still they conquered, and they were divided.
I'm saying, this concept of a single country is not something which is inbuilt in us. Because we were divided and under other's rule most of the time. No one cared about being together as a single nation most of the time in this land. And because of...
Irony.
You dont cite an exception and build upon it. You cite a rule. The rule is this land in most of its time was a divided land, and a conquered land. The exception is for a very little perioid of time we were under a single hindu "sons of the raj" rule. And that's the reality.
I dont care...
You are saying the same line as china which cites ancient kingdoms and conquers land now because some chinese moron king didnt have a better job to do than to that attack and conquer neighbouring countries.
If we calculate the time this land was under a single hindu kingdom, to multiple kingdoms...
No DSI, it needs a curved inlet.
You are in a stealth aircraft, you dont turn on your jammer and tell your enemy, "hey im here"! Jammer is for last resort if you are suppressing your EMCON.
There will be no major modifications. And certainly, the fault we are talking about, the exposed compressor blades, the primary source of radar reflections in the frontal aspect, is here to stay.
Read what i wrote "Without a freedom movement, we would have not been part of the same country but separate republics. The freedom movement build up and idea of togetherness and that helped in keeping this country together in one piece." The freedom movement didnt begin with gandhi, it started...
Where were you all these years? Major design is set. there will be no more major changes!
For china it will be enough, but it never will be a true stealth fighter.
The good thing is our enemies have even more crappier aircrafts than the pak-fa. But that doesn't take away the fact that pak-fa needs modificaton if it needs to be called a true "stealth" fighter, atleast in the frontal aspect.
There was no "final blow". Bose gave up long before WW2 got over.
Its nice to invent new theories to feel better about ourselves, but in the end, we got conquered and got freedom by the will of the same conquerors. And that's that. What Bose and gandhi can claim credit for is making the land...
What a pathetic state of affairs. India should have responded when the issue was hot. Sprouting nonsense after all these years shows complete lack of spine to accept damage in order to inflict death upon the enemy. Right from kargil, parliament, and 26/11. So pathetic.