Search results

Man India should Give this stuff a try , It would be a great Machine for our Special Forces...Especially for our Desert Commandos

RIP , What else can we wish for???

Could You Please show me where I compared Tejas With Rafale In terms Of Technology???? Iam Eager to see it:partay:

Man I enjoyed It, its indeed Rocking

You are good at twisting the Facts, anyways that is not of My concern..... Well Indeed You are correct in a way, DRDO and IAF had two different thinking, While DRDO made this aircraft capable only to replace the Mig 21's IAF wanted it to be superior to the Mirages which they had, and After that...

Wow, Its just marvelous , Thanks for sharing buddy

Rafale might not be a success for the Others, but that dosent mean to be a failure, Rafale suits there Skies and there role.... IAF has not been Arm twisted to buy LCA, if it were to be Like that IAF would have done it in 2000's.... IAF changed the Aircraft from what it was expected to do to...

Gentle man, As I already stated the reason for the delay in its development, Read Post no 126 , also stated the changes done from the very first Flight it took and why.... And If You call Rafale a Failure then Iam sorry I can Only Laugh at Your Ignorance.... And Nothing Comes Cheap, except from...

Kaveri Engine Dry & Wet Thrust Demo Kaveri Engine Cad animation

Yup indeed, we have developed Our Very Own Single Crystal Blade technology....

Did You ever Know an Aircraft called Rafele, Produced by the Masters of Delta wing took 30+ Years..... a Project Initiated in 1970 was Rafale, ring any Bells???? Making aircraft is Not Easy For the rest of the world, Like it is for Pakistan.... And Tejas has not taken 30 Years, It has taken 27...

Did You Ever think of Constant Change in IAF's Expectations??? Eventually IAF wanted it to replace The Mig 21's, then IAF wanted LCA tejas Flight controls to be better than Mirage, Then IAF wanted Wanted More Powerful Engines for LCA tejas, and Hence it had To undergo Sevaral Design changes...

Because tejas has been designed for the role of Interceptor not Air Superiority, For Air Superiority India is Going Ahead with Tejas MK2 and AMCA..... Hope this clears Your Doubt

Check this Link.... It has Quotes of HAL chairman http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/02/12/322472/aero-india-india-unveils-plans-for-lca-mark-2.html

Nop, LCA MK2 will not be same design, it has a separate design, Its Not LIGHT COMBAT Aircraft, but has been stated so because its in the Lines of LCA..... It will be a bigger and heavier aircraft according to HAL chairman.....

LCA 2 Ki baat isliye kar rahan hoon kyon ki, Both these Projects might be governed by the same body, but are tested in various labs of The same governing body, so I dont think Its Un fair to Say about LCA MK2 as Its research is already going on..... as far as LCA mk1, The orders have been...

40 LCA MK1 order has been received from the IAF, and 20 from the Navy, HAL chairman said, there is a requirement of 220 MK1 Tejas for the IAF and Would be fullfilled once the IOC is give this december , in the meanwhile the Production for the 40 Aircrafts have been started and First squadron...

We are In a Comfortable Position mate, We have Licensed Production of Su30 MKI going, We have a side research on LCA MK1, LCA MK2 and AMCA going on, We have Also Partnered In FGFA Project, if You call all this a Majboori, then yeah, we are In great Majboori buddy :lol:

Thanks for the Compliment, Indeed Kind Of You :lol: