What's new

Search results

  1. cw2005

    News Flash: JFT carries out a successful WS-13 Flight test.

    Based on my believing of “No war in the near future” as far as USA needs Pakistan and the leaders of both India and China are smart enough not to spoil the golden chance to grow, this is the great time to benefit for Pakistan. My thinking: 1. CoOp in manufacturing of military...
  2. cw2005

    JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 3]

    BATMAN: Your points of partnership is excellent. This cooperation between partners successs only when each partners contributes and compensates weak points of other partners. Pakistan and China of JF-17 JV is good because: Partner 1 - China contributions: 1. facility to develope, test...
  3. cw2005

    JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 3]

    1. As long as the USA needs Pakistan in its war against Terrorist of Afghanistan, India dare not touch Pakistan nor make any funny moves. 2. In the current situation, India dare not start any war with China, neither the USA. To maintain current situation without a war, China is...
  4. cw2005

    PAF JF-17 in Farnborough Air Show 2010

    Reading the Chinese Defence Forum and the members there were so impressed by the picture of Pakistan JF-17 that suggestion was made to assign the paint job to Pakistan for all Chinese fighters.
  5. cw2005

    JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 3]

    If one of the main purpose of JF is to provide learning for Pakistan, should we keep the number of planes to a more reasonable figure such as 100 in two blocks instead of planning for 150 or more? When you look at the Chinese's strategy on J11, J10 and even its Navy ships, they are building...
  6. cw2005

    Arguments of choosing JF-17 Thunder over JAS-39 Gripen

    I know Sir MK would not be convinced, but I am still trying. California consults with China about high-speed rail California consults with China about high-speed rail | MNN - Mother Nature Network
  7. cw2005

    Arguments of choosing JF-17 Thunder over JAS-39 Gripen

    There is an advantage by going for JF even without considering the cost and other factors. In the scenario of attrition war, PAF feels better if it can manufacture its own fighter. In addition, manufacture capacity of China might provide another source of fighter that PAF is familiar with. It...
  8. cw2005

    JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 3]

    I have been reading MK's comments for some times and I would like to summarise his thinking : MK'S opinion 1. PAF missed a chance in years back. 2. Went for JF-17 was a mistake. 3. USA equipments are useless because during war time with India, USA would destroy them easily. 4. Chinese military...
  9. cw2005

    JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 3]

    Frankly speaking, I don't believe two nuclear power would go to war. No such thing happened before anyway and I don't foresee it happens in near future. That is exactly why NK goes nuclear because once she has it, no one (USA included) would start a war with her. My personnal thinking is...
  10. cw2005

    JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 3]

    If some opinion in this forum is true, Vietnam should have waved white flag to USA, North Korea did the same to South Korea and China did the same to USA. But it did not happen. I truely believe self reliance is the only way out longtermwise.
  11. cw2005

    Please don't ignore China advanced Type 99 tank

    Over the years, I think Pakistan/China have developed some kind of comradeship, for both countries have the courage to challenge much stronger adversary (USA for China and India for Pakistan). This type of relationship is beyong mutual benefit and strategic consideration.
  12. cw2005

    Su-30MKI & JF-17 Air Fight

    I thought both side would be trying to reduce RCS and increase Radar range. At the end of day, the same situation remains as it is.
Back
Top Bottom