Search results

To inform you in plain language - that is not what I am talking about. Good to see, you count that as a factor as well.

Am I talking about relying on charity? I think I am having a conversation with high-school student. I am talking about using the wealth where it is most urgently required. Is that hard to understand? I am talking about using a small percentage of wealth that these people have to do the needful...

Hence, I suggest you consider post no 14.

Oh! What kind of job do you offer to a person who is not even as good as a kid in nursery in education? Buddy, I am talking about people living in extreme poverty.

Can you understand the term "systematic way" of eliminating poverty? I already said that eventually you have to give them jobs, but before that you can help them become capable of doing those jobs. Else you can sleep tight in your comfortable home and let's just leave everything to the...

Eventually, you have to give them job. But before that do also invest a little in them so that they first can start living like humans? How exactly, would they do that is totally dependent on them, and that is another discussion. What do you do when you see a hungry child? Offer him a job?

Why would you do that? Did I say I have any issues with that? All I did was suggest that some more direct and effective measures would be great from a herd of rich sheeps, because for people living n extreme poverty, each day is a fight for survival and so more direct and immediate intervention...

Are talking about growth rate here? No need to come to defense of the rich elites, I only floated a suggestion.

Way to go! But why do you have to try to be nice, unless she is hostile to you. Be nice, plain and simple. :) P.S. Do ask her whether she wants to continue with the mustache or not. Otherwise, who knows, she might come after your pony-tail. ;)

Do you think extreme poverty is being removed by creating jobs? What kind of jobs do they create for people living in extreme poverty? If that is how it goes....it will take hundred more years to see poverty free India.

The hundred richest people of each country should form a group to systematically and effectively remove poverty in their nation.

Now that is not being honest. If you want to ignore them why talk about them? It is not civil to compare people on the basis of their origin or race in a manner that belittles them. Do you honestly think that it is a good thing to do and that in anyway helps you to become a decent person...

So from the articles posted, what has Pakistan learned? That it was only a military failure or more prominently that their cause was not just and they did not find any substantial support from Muslims in Kashmir?

Good one :lol:

Because generally women want to get noticed and men want to notice. :)

Unlike you, I am not bounded by any attachments that can pull me away from truth, that which I always favor. Clean-chit to US? Yes, with what I said. The US gives extreme priority to be the most powerful and influential nation, and for that it has often crossed lines. But that does not means...

They did, but that was just one amongst hundred others that never happened.

That she deliberately wants everyone to fast focus on her? :)

I think the crux of the matter here is that Pakistanis need not compare with anyone at all. Pakistan should focus on what is important for its people, and do the needful. The debate went flying because the first post in the thread unnecessarily compared Pakistan with India and qsaark was correct...

That is anyway an established fact. But the US never intended or imagined that they would go on to become "innocent-blowing mad dogs".