Search results

True as well.

More number of bases probably also means, spreading forces too thin. And it is also more targets. Just saying.

Now dont get all worked up pumpkin. You didnt "smash" anybody, you just outnumbered them. Even then if you look at the figures, you killed about 1300, and we killed around 800, while being outnumbered about 9 times. Thats not smashing anybody. Like I said, China is just a paper superpower...

Then am not sure. Maybe they are lying :lol:

No I agree. I quoted you to further expand that point, not that I disagreed with it.

Socialism is the major cause for failure in India. No economic freedom, corruption and what not. Its a shitty system. A society flourishes when you have economic and political freedom. America did it. South Korea did it. Why not India? This is beyond ridiculous to just scrap FDI. So where in the...

I think India has about 190. Guess that would include trainers.

Of course fighters wont be the only ones to be placed in the frontlines. There will be multiple layers of defence, and the fighters are just one of those components. AWACS, Long range tracking radars, radars on those bases (whatever they are called), AA guns and SAMs will all constitute border...

Remember the Battle of Longewala how your lack of coordination, lack of communication and planning led to your enormous armored division being owned by 120 soldiers? Thats what happens when you dont do a "table top war game". Practicing on the ground is good and all, but you need to get your...

:rofl: :rofl: Solve your problems in central china, fill up those useless ghost towns you have built in the name of "development of infrastructure" then we can talk about you becoming a "superpower". Both India and China will NEVER become superpowers, so being a little ahead of India shouldnt...