Search results

In the proper "1954 Geneva Accords" contexts where is 'legal' or 'illegal' based on. :azn: It was about the independent of Vietnam from France in which French signed the Accords with North Vietnam while South Vietnam had refused it. South Vietnam then has no legal activity in the matter of...

Gambit, Gambit ... how much more lying are you going to perform? :lol: No, you can't and don't even try :lol: No, it is not for North Vietnam had cleverly used the aids from Soviet and China to accomplish its task. South Vietnam was a different scenerio and you knew it better :rofl:

Of course, I knew about Soviet and Chinese aid to North Viet Nam. On the 'legal' side, North Vietnam signed the 1954 Geneva Accords and awaited for the mandated Democratic nationwide elections, but U.S. and South Vietnam did not signed for a reason to against the North Vietnam's Communist known...

It is simple and clear then, South Vietnam did not signed the Accords because the contract may not be in its self interests :lol: So, it relected through the former South Vietnamese Minister of Foreign Affairs - Tran Van Do, whom refused to sign the 1954 Geneva Accords. Not the Viet Minh that...

That was the result of the Mongolian and Manchurian invasion of China. So, you Chinese and Vietnamese are the same people huh!? :azn: Why are you guys fighting over the oil for? Share the wealth kiddos ...

Read it for yourself, Gambit :rofl: Lập trường của Quốc gia Việt Nam * the former South Vietnamese Minister of Foreign Affairs - Tran Van Do, whom refused to sign the 1954 Geneva Accords. Not the Viet Minh that did not want partition. Liar liar pants...

Liar liar pants on fire :lol: dear Gambit! It really is amazing and entertaining at the same time to see Gambit you so eager to make a fool out of yourself. Do you know who was the Chairman of Vietnamese Delegation to the 1954 Geneva Conference? * the former South Vietnamese Minister of...

Now .. now .. :lol: Don't let your anger and ignorance blind you further Gambit! If you don't know, you can ask: South Vietnam did not sign because South Vietnam did not agree to have Vietnam divided into two zones and the U.S. had other motive that later on aided Ngo Dinh Diem into power...

Of course, you don't have any reason left to continue this 'sovereignty' issue further - because all of your definitions pulled from the Internet only led to the fact that Vietnam did not have 'sovereignty' over the two archipelgos Paracel and Spratly. :lol: Sad, but it is the truth and you...

Dude, you're so hilariously dense. :lol: No kidding man ... Did you not read that I also asked and said: Definitely, you do have serious reading comprehension of the English language, Gambit! :azn: In simple English, let I simplify it so you can learn something... 1. Sovereign...

:rofl: What is this? You pulled this definition from the Internet without a clue of what the reality out there is ... to refute me!? You must be desperated :lol: Let's examine it okay ... Sovereign authority is exercised within borders - islands are outside of borders :azn: ... for grap...

Now... now :lol: it's not because I pointed out how childish your argument was then you just wanted to talk back like that huh? Wrong... Your childish argument could not debunk anything in the case of Parcel and Spratly archipelgos in which I have proven such two largest islands Phu Lam...

How contradicted your sentence is. You're not greedy for OIL but you want to drill for IT. Yet, you are saying if China let you drill - don't you have the sovereignty over your water territory? You might consult with lawyer Gambit about this, perhaps! :azn: If you're really care about...

Not really! The first one is the Declaration and the second one is to support the first. So, the two archipelgos Paracel and Spratly are open for grap what is worth ... :rofl:

Please do, can't wait to read your childish argument agian and again ... No, :lol: because I am still the owner of the house and you're not there to stay and decide what to do with my house .. duh! You're still a neighbour - no more no less. Dude ... just wake up on the wrong side of...

Wrong...The North Vietnamese 1958 letter to China was about the Paracels, Spratlys, Taiwan and all of China's coastal islands. :laugh: See post 324... http://www.defence.pk/forums/china-defence/112548-vietnam-acknowledged-chinese-sovereignty-over-south-china-sea-1958-a-22.html#post1972274

:laugh: Actually, NORTH VIET NAM ALREADY SIGNED OFF THOSE ISLANDS TO CHINA - thus, it shown how ignorance of Secretary Kissinger for asking such a question: What has North Vietnam’s reaction been to all of this?. Private Gambit, show Secretary Kissinger the letter of PM Pham Van Dong...

From which Chinese posters that you have expected as the next incoming argument like that? You have shown us your fabricated lies from one thing to another. You lied about administrative rights over the islands was given to South Vietnam when it was not. When I pointed it out your lies, you...

The Government of Democratic Republic of Vietnam acknowledge and is in full agreement with the Declaration on 14th September 1958 of the PRC on its Resolution pertaining to its territorial waters. Declaration on 14th September 1958 of the PRC - stated: 1. The breadth of the territorial...

No, French did not mistaken Nam Quan as Pha Luy. If French did, then there was no reason for you not to post the original picture and corrected it. Instead, the top information portion got cut off to suit your need. That is a shame. It was stated in your history book. You can even read it...