Search results

I dont know any thing about submarine based air defense even heard 1st time.:lol:

If we take 10M$ per heli, than 2B$ for deal, while infrastructure cost is higher. While LUH cost will be low in twice of sense. SAMs are more essential than helicoters, you also know this very well.

submarine-based air defence...........:undecided: I will try to find out about sources & also report on trishul test. But till than what I remember... Well, Trishul did perform well in test ( mainly failure due to failure of guidance system when it approaches towards near the target)...

No, this based on unsung hero Trishul, whole mechanical mechanism is based on trishul to reduce cost of development while MBDA is providing guidance system. I have my doubt over IA's procurement over these missile, while I think IAF would place 30+ system of that & IN would put one system in...

Even i read somewhere that it was too usual jamming of M4 in Iraq. AK reliability is incomparable.

They are referring a bullet import from Isreal which was in 1999 kargil war when we just induct Insas in large number but didn't have time to change OFD's machine to produce 5.56mm rounds.

Jaise Dravid ki innings Sachin/gaguli ki innings k niche dab jati thi, thik vaise hi Rafale ne ise daba diye:lol:

You can not say it just beause it lost in tender, may be it was not fullfill requirement of users.......

J11 is incomplete copy of su27, even under performer.... & you called it only for fighting machine...:rofl:

Chutiye Chinese..............after every few post they iterated same thing India can't even manufacture a bullet by itself. Abe loduo jb kuch pta nhi hai to kyun post krte ho, yhan 40 OFDs hai jinme se maximum sirf bullet banane ka kam krte hai....:rofl::rofl:

Thats why we are so choosy, otherwise every single plate-form in Indian defense service wants replacement/outdated.

Thats mean Maitri is already developed or near to develop & nearly ready for field trails & inductance..................( I guess)

This is because we were sleeping like KUMBHAKARN for last 2 decades, but as says.....jb neend khule tab savera......so cheer up bro...:tup:

Untill prospect of deal will not open you can not quetion about price tag, may be it include hole development cost as well as initial order.....:azn: What is this ToT....:woot: Because none of them is quick reaction, which is essential for low level air-defense.:azn: BTW you can not see the...

Isreally SAM (Barak1) is used by IN. While Russian SAMs used by IAF & IA, but Indian (AKASH) & French (Maitri) will replace them. New Isrealy SAM(Barak8) will place in IAF & IN. :Lol: So we will use only 3 countries SAM 1-INDIA 2-ISREAL 3-FRANCE

Thats good for you, so instead of posting just cheer guysssss...........for that....:tdown:

........I dont think that AMCA will ever face condition like that........LCA mk2 will be fitted with AESA radar, so AMCA will also be ( by that time AESA will not remain so much blunder, i guess). Well on engine phase...............well it may be with TV or without TV but much more important...

VSHORAD.......:no::no::no:Abhi to tender nikla hai kms se km 4-5 year lg gayenge dost.. Spyder are in IAF, but in very few# to protect few key installation around India. Failure of Trishul leads IAF towards this. So there is also too bigger scope for Maitri in IAF.:yahoo: Barak1 is good but...

yes, you are 100%:agree: right...

hahaa... you are wright, those journalist dont know any thing but try to put masaala in front of audience. Than we make fun of them......:agree: