Search results

:tup: You are wright we are still in duck even in low end. But thats doesnt mean that we can not analyses other fighters.:azn:

:tup::tup::tup::tup: Thats why we support AMCA.dont you

f35 is nothing except 21 century falcon, a low cost supplement for forces.

Thats the basic diff in iaf n paf doctrine. Iaf concern more on air superiority while paf more on ground attack as you can see it through history n procurment. But surely there r exception n 1st rule dont underestimet yr enemy.

Well if amca have thrust vector engine than canards have less work to do, so no need of them. But i m surprised at what level they will able to reduce ir signature if it 3d tv will put, as in fgfa. Canards will improve menourability n control surface but main drawback of that is increased drag...

Nooo.:astagh:

Yes, this project is not feasible as per economic, ecologic & religious way. We are with you BJP, f--k them all.:sniper:

:rofl::rofl: So now chinese will destroy china themself. Good job keep going.:yahoo:

Why we not take it other perspective. We can modify Mill17 for VVIP purpose. I mean put more luxry on it, EW suit & counter measures which DRDO can develop. It was low cost & more better angle & may be he was talking about that.:omghaha:

I should not ask that but showing your ignorance towards AMCA, what is the benefit of Rafale in IAF while we already have MKI (very low cost), super MKi & FGFA are nearly on their way.:what:

yes, there r lot of nepalese here. We know what they think about us.

privet companies privet companies

I dont think. It will have range of maximum 15km. But it is quick reaction missile so no need to compare it to other systems.

Completely depend on system. As wiki iterated fm90 cost is ~160000$ per system & 25000$ per missile. While system like S400 are too much costly. Thats why I am saying that BD dont need system having range of 50/75km because S400+HQ12 can do its role precisely. Now you need to put your best...

What I read from wiki is HQ12 has 35km & HQ16 has 50km range, btw there still dont have any profit of inducting twice of them untill ships case occur.:undecided:

BD is purchasing S400, so there is no room for high-low configuration. That will be cost burden for BD. Yes if they are not buying S400 than you can say they are mixing high-low. Can you tell us more about these high-low systems.:azn:

That was because what you were saying........like come & try to invade BD,.........and other such non-sense talking, if you challenge someone than he will try to kick in your *** wright. So instead of making things complicated for yourself, just try to smoth ride..:tup: HQ12 & HQ 16b has...

You are wright....asia has gotten once in a life time opportunity to rule the world ,.....but you should also support us to lead world beside china but look what are doing, just making enemy in front of you.......:no:.....that can make your country........, thanks to god that your governament...

Are you sure, I mean seeker from Trishul...........????

Indeed a good comparison although too many contradiction in paper itself. But one thing which I support here that F35 nothing provide compare any other except stealth. USAF concern so much in stealth & forget about basic fighter parameters.