Search results

Actually no. If Indian public perceives this as unjust ban they can do widespread rallies or protest in your own words. Indians especially in this particular case are more inclined or favored towards ban. There are better things to be worried about for both public and government. Personally I...

No. India might push to call ISI as a terrorist organisation in UN. This verdict will provide boost to it. Not to mention loss of credibility of Pakistan as a whole in international community. But hey who cares right?

Credibility ha? Why are you all Pakistanis joyous then? Aren't we talking of same 'Headly' here? Are there two different witnesses here? If this is seen as truth then all other things that he said before must be true as well. Don't you think? Yet court hasn't given a ruling yet. They are still...

I don't understand if ISI men are involved in it how is ISI as an organisation not involved? Are you saying ISI has no control over its men? Obviously ISI, Army, Political leadership are divided in Pakistan. They don't have a common goal. When we say ISI is involved, we are actually talking of...

OMG..Mental masturbation that is going on here is astonishing. Sure if Russia doesn't want a relationship with India then its their problem. India is not desperate to court other superpowers like our immediate neighbors. They should know India reacts even more strongly when snubbed. Its their...

Basically Rajapaska got India's support for war after he promised to devolve power to regional states so Tamils could have a stake in power. He has to make good on his promises otherwise Sri lanka as a country would be at loss for making India as their enemy. No other country could do anything...

Here is the more balanced analysis by other Srilankans outside this forum.

Problem is 80% of SAARC trade is through India. Its gonna go much higher. Nobody cares about a bloc without India in it.

Who cares? try countering us. And please stop the rhetoric until then.

American Media? India media can just as can counter that. Indian media is big enough for that.

Entire article is based on hearsay and random news that he could collect. Saying 40% of land is controlled by secessionists is moronic. Indian public could hardly care about few thousand secessionists. PS: Authors bias against India is clearly seen. In fact it is really amusing that he thinks...

Tell that to Hindus of Bangladesh too.

Come on, don't you know he read a survey about 1.2 billion people. It gave him exact figures.

At least they can respite through this ignorant pride. Alas. Tomorrow some might even offer them a job because of their good looks. Better yet just write the company in their name for free. A terrorist might just stop blowing himself thinking he might damage his good looks. hehe.

Actually let Pakistanis have good relationship with Russia. So we can apply pressure through both US and Russia. Congrats Pakistan.

He read enough news to have complete knowledge on India. He could actually teach us about it too.

Actually it serves India well. He is currently been seen as symbolic for Mumbai attacks carried by Pakistani terrorists. By keeping him alive and discussing him in our news we are actually keeping the issue alive.

When did I say I believe it. May be you should read again. I specifically said it to be a conspiracy statement yet within the realm of reality. We all know ISI's affinity to Taliban, don't we?

But would they attack India for it? No one cares about Nomenclature. I didn't think China supported Pakistan during Kargil, did they?