I agree we chinese should not often mention 1962 sino-india conflict as it's long time back. in fact i dont see 1962 topic in other chinese forums. i learnt the most 1962 thing from this PDF forum.
well we chinese should forget 1962, I also suggest indians especially indian military leadership...
Is Reverse engineering a Good Option for India?
no, it's not a good option. it's not even an option for india as of now due to its poor industrial knowledge base.
some indian members like to bashing China as a copycat but they conveniently forget india is not even qualified to be a copycat...
congrates! u finally found BR :rofl::rofl:
this BR site is a eye opener for me to know many indians somehow have superiority complex against chinese people. i don't know why but i guess indian medias must played a big role for this?
Back to the thread topic, ws10a is a big break through...
i'm not a big fan of Mr. liu xiaobo but i salute to him for his courage to face up ccp. i'm not too sure what he had done is good for current China but i think it's nevertheless a vision for future China.
no, 1962 sino-india war was hardly a full blown war for China. China just sent its No.130 division of No.54 army corp to have the job done.
China had one major war with US lead UN(Korea war), several border wars with India, USSR and Vietnam respectively.
sorry, i failed to understand your...
very well said :tup:
we have seen successful examples like taiwan/southkorea/singapore developed their countries under dictorship first then turned to democracy later at a time when their social bases were well prepared for the change. Same for japan that developed a solid social base before...
don't forget China is 3 times bigger than India in size so she needs more spending on defence.
i don't know what on other chinese mind but i would call it disproportionate if China spend much on defence but has many ppl starving to death;has shitty infrastructures;lowest public health...
Yes, u r very right on this.
Mr.Xdrive is proved a liar in another thread some time ago, no need to waste time on him. And I remember he was hiding behind Aussie flag when he was caught to be a liar. Now he is using Pakistani flag? once a liar, always a liar?
no, i'm not rocket scientist. in fact i'm not even a scientist.
i raised my doubt in previous post--"if Agni III has a range 6000km with 1400kg payload according to the above graph, i then failed to understand why india is trying so hard to develop Agni V with 5000km range?"
and the graph...
buddy, i never thought here has a 10 years old solider :rofl:
car example not worked:angry:. i'm running out of ideas, perhaps only teddy bear kinda stuff can make our young solider understand. but i found it's very hard to connect 'payload' with teddy bear element. i rest my case for him.
thanks bro. that's the simplest example i can think of. don't know why some ppl still cannot get it.
the missile itself has a much bigger weight compare with it's payload. per wiki Agni (missile) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Agni weight and range:
Agni I 12000 kg 700km
Agni II...
Jana, thanks for the very important info. u saved me 2 seconds opening the link and 5 mins to actually read it--i'm sure i would stop reading it after 5 mins.
Is this graph drawed by some fanboy?
if Agni III has a range 6000km with 1400kg payload according to the above graph, i then failed...
i dont know why u gave me this aus trade link? does it clear ur lie that aussie "everyone mainly purchases products that arnt from china in my country"?
i have no idea what that aus trade commisions has anything to do with ur open lie statement. i also dont know why u lied as u cannot gain...
pls quote my words if i said that, otherwise it's another lie from u.
pls quote my words if i said that, otherwise it's yet another lie from u.
thank you.