so a media from a country which spends more % of GDP on defence than india even after being on verge of bankruptcy while india is doing well on economical front , is advising india to reduce its defence spendings. wow i really grateful to pakistan for there concern about indian issues.:cheers...
and how is a tiny uaca going to face aircrafts????? i mean with there given size UACV can carry very less armaments how are they going to cause a potential damage to a full fledged air force???
and for those who think UACV are for fighting wars
basic purpose of UACV is to carry out attacks on...
i already knew about interference by usa but never knew about damn britishers.
and its really great to know we shared such a nice relationship with USSR. long live INDO RUSSIAN friendship
biggest joke
actually savarkar and co wanted akhand bharat without any partition . They were just against giving any special rights to muslims just for being minority over hindus meaning equal rights for both.
gandhi oked the partition and even after partition kept on favouring pakistan hence...
see this link and inform yourself who Savarkar was
he was also a political person not extremist and he was leader of hindu mahasabha like jinnah was for ml
Vinayak Damodar Savarkar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
either you didnt read my post or you dont understand
i never called him terrorist
i said just because savarkar was a leader of hindu mahasabha it doesnt make him hindu fanatic just like jinnah who was leader of muslim league.
read things well before you reply:hitwall:
miss jana since you are reporter you should research more about saying anything about people you dont know.
do you even know Savarkar was a freedom fighter?
yes he formed hindu mahasabha but Jinnah also formed MUslim league that doesnt makes any of them as terrorists:hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
lil correction INDIA did not refused it was pakistan who took a U turn saying they cant send there ISI cheif to india . why would INDIA refuse to something it demanded?
you read my post well i said he did not killed gandhi for religious matter.
and thats why his act cant be called as a hindu terrorism.
and nowhere i am saying that he is innocent
so how not pulling of indian population from dark harms bangladesh??
or are you suggesting that this poor indians migrate to bangladesh to add to your problems?????:hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
gandhi was killed by a hindu but not for hinduism he was killed for betterment of nation as per thoughts of assasiner it didnt had any religious aspect.
and according to you if pakistan is world then good luck
i got it now why is pakistan not getting an intelligent leader. If someone talks sense but little concerning to pakistan he is not pakistani according to people:D
but what matters is "What People"
Democratic means - ' Of the poeple (as tax mony of the masses), for the pople (as for Elite/governing), by the people (as by the elite/govering.
i think you are mistaken, we are talking about INDIAN democracy :cheesy:and what you have written explains...
when i joined this forum one of the rules said propoganda is not allowed on this forum but then why is this a exception??????
maybe because this is anti INDIA propoganda?
mods please take a note of this propoganda thread and if atall it is truth then give original wikileak for it or else dont...
but if atall china has chosen india over pakistan and india and china are friends then why the hell will indian navy cut off chinese supply ???????:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl: