yeah we are really expecting change. something like real better deal next time WITHOUT STRINGS ATTACHED.
when we pay for something we want to use those things at out own wish. If you cant handle it then keep your things to yourself. i hope messege is clear this time.
`we are powerful enough to tackle any country without using nukes first so we dont need to change our no first use policy.
weapons of mass destruction are not meant to be used actually. they are their just to stop the wars with the fear of destruction and i dont want to see INDIA nuking any...
The only problem is each country looks for its own interests,
INDIA looks for its best interest and others look for their best interests.
you cant satisfy interest of everyone.
eg. if you help NEPAL with security matters then they will say that INDIA is bully and if you dont then they will...
i was off this site from long time so i have missed lot of action i guess
i saw lot of bangladeshi's claiming that BD is getting nothing out of this deal and still it is baring infrastructure cost which seems absurd. can anyone enlighten me whats in this deal for BD?
F-35 is perfectly what it is meant to be
a 5th generation plane cheaper than F-22, a cost effective solution for having more number of 5th gen. planes at lesser cost.
its also meant to be exported to allies, and nobody gives their best weapon to others.
yeah off course thats why we cater more muslims than pakistan or many other muslim countries.
you need to work harder to convince with your BS propoganda.:devil:
it wont be used against opponent jets. we dont need cruise missile to bring down jet,small BVR or WVR missile can suffice that with speed excessive of 4 mach.
this are integrated on MKI to attack big ground targets. and to deliver nukes if needed.:coffee:
nobody is disrespecting any shaheed.
All the soldiers are to be respected whether they are enemy or our own.
but it is fact that at first pakistan refused that soldiers in kargil are pakistani soldiers but later own agreed to it.
so you are now gonna bring 65's weapon to counter todays INDIA's weapon?????/:rofl::rofl:
and if you want to look at history then why just chunks favorable to you?
why not look at war of longewala , war of 1971.:bunny:
if coumtry with huge number of terrorists can go to war on terror why cant a country with high number of poors help afghanistan????:devil:
we are also good at giving examples of irony.:rofl:
and by the way this is not my view its theirs...
i make sense only to sensible people and cant help it so sorry.
read the article before asking whether i make sense or not.
pakistan is ready to send onion through sea route but banned to do so via vagha border, it also want INDIA to reduce curbs on cotton in return of exort on onions.
so if at...
if pakistan can send onions through sea route why not through land route?
if you have domestic shortage and reached the export limit then how the hell can you supply it through sea route also or is it that onions exported through sea root dont have any effect on domestic market but only land...