Search results

If it is so common knowledge post links which confirms it. This is common knowledge and you still didn't know about it! How come? But unlike you i will posts link to "common knowledge". Take-off Magazine : RD-33: output on the rise "Finally, the RD-93, a RD-33 derivative with the low-mounted...

The contract is HALF COMPLETE!! Can't u read? Corrected. :lol: Block 2 coming this year without engines. :lol: Who is saying that?

I'm not calling any names, only saying what is their profession. :tongue: How can they fly without engines? Who knows when will PAF will place the order and then they have to manufacture it. They still haven't made any request in July 2012. Even if they place the request now, they have to start...

Faceless character is for your forum fanboy buddies. I posted it before, see it for yourself. It's not my fault you're a douche. It clearly says, you have only got 50 engines till now. Good luck on your block 2. I wonder how it will fly, maybe it will fly when Pigs fly. :lol:

See the date of that link fanboy. I posted that link plenty of time and yet your brain didn't register it. you are hopeless! "Finally, the RD-93, a RD-33 derivative with the low-mounted accessory gearbox, is exported to China to fit FC-1 (JF-17) light single-engine fighters. The deal for 100...

You believe some faceless characters on the forum, then good for you, but bad it's for logic and proof. The 50 engines still not delivered news came is very new. It is a more recent news than Kanwa and it comes straight from the source, the maker of RD-93 engine. So it seems either the chinese...

Again with the insiders and PDFers. You are hopeless buddy. :lol: Would you believe the same if someone from Indian forums claims LCA has already fully integrated LGB and the testing is fully done? It's good that you respect those insiders from your country, but ppl from other country wont take...

I posted a SCAN. I didn't not post that thread. I only wanted the scan from Kanwa. What did you post? Even I can type that JF-17 has been integrated with lasers and say it's from Janes defence weekly.

That's what i said, it may be fully a make believe story. The poster could have atleast posted a scan. Hell, not even a scan, taken a snap from his mobile camera and posted the page atleast. It is just some words written by some pakistani. Who would believe that?

Already posted by Mafiya. That one is a fake thing, it is not a scan, nor a link. Just typed by some fanboy with a "Airforce daily" header.

Arent you the one who was screaming about the info pool thread? http://www.defence.pk/forums/jf-17-thunder/71435-jf-17-thunder-information-pool-23.html#post2893762 "- In 2011 the JF17 test fired: 1 x C802 (hit a seaborne target 90km away, max range 180km); 2 x LS-6 bombs, one is a 500kg GPS...

The main question is operational deployment, not testing. Kanwa news report said that SD-10 is still under testing, meaning testing is still not done. And it makes sense for PAF to accept the BVR missile with top notch performance since this is one of the main reason for pursuing the JF-17...

It was the prototype in China which was carrying it. Even if we go by your logic and say JF-17 has done release test of SD-10, it only means it is still undergoing testing, and testing is not fully complete. Which is why proof of SD-10 in operational squadrons is necessary to prove it is...

So basically what you are doing is ASSUMING that since JF-17 is inducted and numbers around 40+, it has to be BVR capable. Assumption goes both ways. I'm ASSUMING, even after 3 squadrons inducted and several years of testing, PAF is still not satisfied with SD-10 in its current form and is...

Yea, manufactures claim it's BVR capable right from 2007 according to your theory that Manufactures website claims it is BVR capable. Talk about dumb. :lol: If in 2007, it is still under testing according to your stupid theory, then why can't it be under testing now as well. Why does suddenly...

You are the one who is twisting things and saying crap like SD-10 is inducted without proof. Fact is Junk Fighter 17 is a failed piece of $hit which still hasn't achieved BVR capability even after 3 squadrons and 6 years of testing(according to you).

It just means even after 6 years(according to you) and 3 squadrons later, Chinese can't make SD-10 work. Because there is something fundamentally wrong with Junk Fighter - 17.

If in 2007, if it is still under testing according to your theory, then why can't it be under testing now as well. Why does suddenly your link means JFT is operational, while my link means testing? Your link should also mean testing right according to your own dumbass theory, you waste of oxygen?

WHERE IS IT MENTIONED??? CAN'T YOU EVEN READ PROPERLY??? Don't you know the meaning of WILL??? Ok, forget 2009, how about 2007? It was BVR capable from 2007? PAC 2007

Where was it signed you twit? You Air chief didn't sign anything! He just said they will buy it in God knows when. So does the link I posted. It says JF-17 is BVR capable in 2009. So JF-17 was BVR capable from 2009? If your answer is yes, then please kill yourself and save the oxygen. Do not...