Search results

Actually, I think both Europe & China will benefit GREATLY in large jet transports R&D, if China could work more closely with Airbus. It will help China in gaining critical tech, while Airbus could learn from Chinese management efficiency. For a nation that just built its 5th generation...

Russia is important to China as an energy supplier. Also, the opposing gender inbalance on both sides is especially helpful in containing China's testosterone surge.

Whatever "final configuration" T-50 will have, the Russians simply don't have the money to get there. And Indian money won't help much if you combine it with Indian bureaucratic FUBAR.

Ever heard of the expression "阿兜仔"?

T-6 Texan II is essentially a license-built modified Swiss design. It has more to do with pride in political system (commies & former commies no need to apply) than nationality.

How so? Better post it here than in Turkey or China DEFENCE forum.

If you've lived in the US long enough, you'll understand why Indian inmigrants have no love lost for the US, and why many of them are increasingly more sympathetic toward other non-Western nations.

Performing Uzbek song Yayramon.

Civilian market prices do not necessarily reflect cost of manufacture. Check out some of the sources that cater specifically to government agencies. HK416 is considrably cheaper than SCAR-L, so the same should be true for HK417 WRT SCAR-H.

I think we should move this thread to another sub-forum.

SCAR is simply too expensive. HK417 costs only 2/3 as much.

You have live in the US for at least a couple of years to understand why he asked those questions.

威龍, sounds like a Jackie Chan movie.

Alrite, my first post, and it's not exactly military-related. As an avian biologist, and a licensed falconry, I must object to the common practice by Chinese layperson to MISTRANSLATE eagle, hawk, buzzard, harrier, osprey, falcon, etc., as 鷹。 I mean, common, we invented falconry...