Okay. I misunderstand. Qiangs are genetically similar to the people in Shang Dynasty who is famous for trading according to some findings from archaeology .
And I am surprised by your words 白痴.
They are Chinese and I call myself AnHuiese.
It is just a vocabulary.
Which Yao you refer to?
Both are your indian because your Indian had no history before British came.
Han Dynasty is after Qin Dynasty. haha.
We call ourselves Han and we can also call Tang, HuaXia, ZhongHua, etc
The spirits of Han Dynasty are much closer to our mental world. We can call ourselves Tang because it's romantic. And the race have been changing continuously which made what we are...
What a interesting theory.You district Han from tibetan-Burmese ignoring that Han separated from it.
And the fake historical fact is also created by you that British never reaches Fake AP.British did reach there but never ruled that place, and you indian stolen south Tibet based on the British...
I do have taiwan families because my father's elder brother is a taiwanese and I do have friends came from tibetan,they are all my neighbors.
And the dalai is one of the religion leaders in Tibet, he is not a government that he can't represent the Tibet.
When talking about dalai,I have a more...
A central power can't stand the whole china with little powers around .
Qin Shi Huang didn't know he is Han 'cause there wasn't a nation called Han. Haha
Really? Even the most acknowledged historian cannot dare to say that.
You will learn different history with chinese language.
At least they are not Indian.
We evaluate a historical person from different aspects. He is a hero in some way, but his emperor is not the first. HuangDi is the first and he is our hero forever.
:sarcastic::sarcastic:
Yes. He is a Chinese of the future.
What about the King of Sikkim?He haven't admitted that Sikkim is a part of india.International admission of that it's a part of india was because China admitted it.
From Han's books,Japanese books, Korean books, Vietnam books, Mongolia books, Tibetan books, European books, Middle Asian books, etc and huge amounts of findings of Archaeology and huge amounts of culture sites, etc.
That means no existence of india.
Chinese are cultures went through lots of times of separations and merges. India is just so-called ancient culture that never existed ,still in slavery.
The public of Manipur, the public of Western Bangladesh and the public of Sikkim,etc. We can help all of them.
Enjoy your psycholagny
Yes.India never ever existed before the British's colonization.
Just many tribes and nations which were still stay in slavery management.
Some nations could...